Language policy and linguistic theory

Languages in a Globalising World

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 47-57

  Kibbee, Douglas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30644472389     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613739.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Alter, Stephen G. 1999, Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language Race and Naturai Theology in the Nineteenth Century, Baltimore/London, Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Balibar, Renee and Laporte, Dominique 1974, Lefrancaisnational, politique etpratique de la langue nationale sous la Révolution, Paris, Hachette.
3. Branson, Amy 1996, Caucus leader says Ebonics debate overshadows real problems facing poor Blacks in LEGI-SLATE News Service, December 31.
4. Calvet, Louis-Jean 1999, Pour une ecologie des langues du monde, Paris, Plon.
5. Desmet, Piet 1996, La linguistique naturaliste en France (1867-1922): Nature, origine et evolution du langage (= Orbis/Supplementa: Monographies publiees par le Centre international de Dialectologie generale 6), Leuven/Paris, Peeters.
6. De Swaan, Abram 1993, ‘The evolving European language system: A theory of com- munication potential and language competition,’ International Political Science Review 14: 241-255.
7. Duron, Jacques 1963, Langue francaise, langue humaine, Paris, Larousse.
8. Graddol, David 1997, The Future of English, London, The British Council.
9. Gutierrez, David G. 1998, ‘Ethnic Mexicans and the transformation of ‘American’ social space: Reflections on recent history,’ in Marcelo M. Suarez-Orozco (ed.), Crossings. Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge, MA, David Rockefeller Centre for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, pp. 308-335.
10. Hale, Ken 1998, ‘On endangered languages and the importance of linguistic diversity,’ in Lenore A. Grenoble and Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.,) Endangered Languages: Current Issues and Future Prospects, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 192-216.
11. Haugen, E.I. 1972, The Ecology of Language, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
12. Haut Conseil de la Francophonie 1998, Etat de lafrancophonie dans le monde: Rapport 1997-1998. Paris, La documentation francaise.
13. Honey, John 1997, Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies, London/Boston, Faber and Faber.
14. Karttunen, Frances and Crosby, Alfred W. 1995, ‘Language death, language genesis, and world history,’ Journal of World History 6: 157-174.
15. Krauss, Michael 1992, ‘The World’s Languages in Crisis,’ Language 68: 4-10.
16. Lalanne-Berdouticq, Philippe 1979, Appel aux francophones: Pour le francais, langue d’Europe, Paris, La pensee universelle.
17. Lavenir, de Buffon Herve 1999, ‘Charte olympique et langue francaise,’ Défense de la Langue Francaise 192: 12-13.
18. Luebke, Frederick C. 1980, ‘Legal Restrictions on Foreign Languages in the Great Plains States, 1917-1923,’ in Paul Schach (ed.), Languages in Conflict: Linguistic Acculturation on the Great Plains, Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 1-19.
19. Mufwene, Salikoko 1998, ‘The ecology of language: New imperatives in linguistics curricula,’ Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 28: 135-145.
20. Muhlhausler, Peter 1996, Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Impe- rialism in the Pacific Region, London, Routledge.
21. Nerlich, Brigitte 1990, Change in Language: Whitney, Bmal and Wegener, London/New York, Routledge.
22. Phillipson, Robert and Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove 1996, ‘English Only Worldwide or Language Ecology?,’ TESOL Quarterly 30: 429-452.
23. Picone, Michael D. 1996, Anglicisms, Neologisms and Dynamic French, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
24. Soll, Ludwig 1968, ‘Shampooing und die Integration des Suffixes -ing,’ in Helmut Stimm and Julium Wilhelm (eds.), Verba et vocabula: Ernst Gamillscheg zum 80. Gerburstag, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 565-578.
25. Spence, Nicol 1991, ‘Les mots francais en -ING,’ Le francais moderne 59: 188-213.