Display of search results in Hebrew: A comparison study between Google and LCC&K interface

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 164-177

  Drori, Offer ^a,b   Tamir, Ehud ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Google; Hebrew; LCC K interface

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); INTERNET; LINGUISTICS; MORPHOLOGY;

GOOGLE; HEBREW; LCC&K INTERFACE; TEXTUAL DATABASES;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 30644470940     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551505052345     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. B. Amento, W. Hill, L. Terveen, D. Hix and P. Ju, An empirical evaluation of user interfaces for topic management of Web sites. In: Proceedings of CHI'99, Pittsburgh PA USA, May 1999 (ACM Press, New York, 1999) 552-9.
2. M. Serbrechts, J. Vasilakis, M. Miller, J. Cugini and S. Laskowski, Visualizations of search results: a comparative evaluation of text, 2D, and 3D interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1999) (ACM Press, New York, 1999) 3-10.
3. O. Zamir and O. Etzioni, Grouper: a dynamic clustering interface to Web search results. In: Proceedings of WWW8 (WWW, Toronto, 1999) 1361-74.
4. A. Veerasamy and R. Heikes, Effectiveness of a graphical display of retrieval results. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1997) (ACM Press, New York, 1997) 236-45.
5. R. Chimera, Value bars: an information visualization and navigation tool for multi-attribute listings. In: Proceedings of CHI 1992 (ACM, New York, 1992) 293-4.
6. M.A. Hearst, TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access. In Proceedings of CHI 1995 (ACM, New York, 1995) 59-66.
7. M.Q.W. Baldonado and T. Winograd, SenseMaker: an information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. In: Proceedings of ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, CHI 1997 (ACM Press, New York, 1997) 11-18.
8. B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998).
9. M. Hertzum and E. Frokjaer, Browsing and querying in online documentation: a study of user interface and the interaction process, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2) (1996) 136-61.
10. T.K. Landauer, The Trouble with Computers - Usefulness, Usability and Productivity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
11. D.E. Egan et al., Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser. In: Proceedings of CHI 1989 (ACM, New York, 1989) 205-10.
12. B.L. Allen, Perceptual speed, learning and information retrieval performance. In: Proceedings of the 17th SIGIR Conference (ACM Press, Dublin, 1994) 71-80.
13. P. Pirolli et al., Scatter/gather browsing communicates the topic structure of a very large text collection. In: Proceedings of CHI 1996 (ACM, New York, 1996) 213-20.
14. O. Drori, The benefits of displaying additional internal document information on textual database search results lists. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries - ECDL2000 (September 2000, Lisbon, Portugal) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2000) 69-82, [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1923.] Available at: http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/1923/19230069.htm (accessed 11 January 2005).
15. O. Drori, Improving display of search results in information retrieval systems - user's study. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on New Development in Digital Libraries, NDDL 2001, In conjunction with ICEIS 2001 (Setubal, Portugal, July 2001) (ICEIS Press) 20-33. Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori072001.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).
16. O. Drori, Using keywords to improve the display of search results list. In: Proceedings of Informing Science 2002 Conference (Cork, Ireland, June 2002), 383-95. Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori062002.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).
17. O. Drori, Using text elements by context to display search results in information retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the Hypertext 2000 & Digital Libraries 2000 Workshop on Information Doors - Where Information Search and Hypertext Link (San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2000) 17-22. Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori052000.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).
18. O. Drori, Using Text Elements by Context to Display Search Results in Information Retrieval Systems Model and Research Results (2000). [Technical Report No. 2000-35 of the Leibniz Center for Research in Computer Science, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.] Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori082000b.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).
19. Google, www.google.com (accessed 11 January 2005).
20. O. Drori, Using knowledge engineering tool to identify the subject of document - research results. In: Proceedings of ICEIS 2003 - 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (April 2003, Angers, France) 442-5. Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori042003.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).
21. O. Drori, Using Frequently Occurring Words to Identify the Subject of a Document (2001). [Technical Report No. 2001-7 of the Leibniz Center for Research in Computer Science, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.] Available at: www.compscipreprints.com/comp/Preprint/offerd/20020729.1/1/ (accessed 11 January 2005).
22. O. Drori, Display of search results in Google-based Yahoo! vs LCC&K interfaces: a comparison study. In: Proceedings of Informing Science 2003 Conference (June 2003, Pori, Finland) 309-20. Available at: http://shum.huji.ac.il/~offerd/papers/drori062003-b.pdf (accessed 11 January 2005).