Bayesian eggs and Bayesian omelettes: Reply to Stern (2005)

Psychological Methods

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 500-503

  Klugkist, Irene ^a   Laudy, Olav ^a   Hoijtink, Herbert ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bayesian approach; Model inference; Posterior probabilities

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL;

EID: 30544452462     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.500     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289-300.
2. Howson, C. (2002). Bayesianism in statistics. In R. Swinburne (Ed.), Bayes theorem (pp. 39-69). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Keselman, H. J., Cribbie, R., & Holland, B. (1999). The pairwise multiple comparison multiplicity problem: An alternative approach to familywise and comparisonwise Type I error control. Psychological Methods, 4, 58-69.
4. Klugkist, I., Kato, B., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Bayesian model selection using encompassing priors. Statistica Neerlandica, 59, 57-69.
5. Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 477-493.
6. Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147-163.
7. Romeyn, J. W. (in press). Theory change and Bayesian statistical inference. Philosophy of Science.
8. Sober, E. (2002). Bayesianism: Its scope and limits. In R. Swinburne (Ed.), Bayes theorem (pp. 21-38). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9. Stern, H. S. (2005). Model inference or model selection: Discussion of Klugkist, Laudy, and Hoijtink (2005). Psychological Methods, 10, 494-499.