Accuracy, reliability, and human factors associated with self-monitoring of blood glucose

Journal of Clinical Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 83-90

  Davis, Elizabeth ^a   Latman, Neal S ^a  

^a WEST TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; DEVICE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONITOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SELF MONITORING; STANDARD;

EID: 30444456514     PISSN: 03638855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004669-200504000-00043     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. CDC. Prevalence of diabetes. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ diabetics/pubs/estimates.htm.
2. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement: self monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(suppl 1):S262-S266.
3. Gray DS. Diabetes mellitus, type 2. In: Dambro MR, ed. Griffith's 5 Minute Clinical Consult. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:314-315.
4. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T, eds. Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999:913-926.
5. Latman NS. Evaluation of electronic, digital blood glucose monitors. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1991;25:43-49.
6. Correll G, Cehelsky D, Mingora M, Weber S, Torio M. Evaluation of Several Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Whole Blood Glucose Measurements at the Point of Care AACC 52nd Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, 2000:23-27.
7. Li KL, Huang HS, Lin JD. Comparing of self monitoring blood glucose devices. Lab Med. 1994;25:585-591.
8. Nichols JH, Howard C, Loman K, Miller C, Nyberg D, Chan D. Laboratory and bedside evaluation of portable glucose meters. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:244-251.
9. Vallera JA, Bissell MG, Barron W. Accuracy of portable blood glucose monitoring effect of glucose level and prandial state. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;95:247-252.
10. SYNCHRON LX® System Chemistry Information. December 1998. 1-13.