Provider dilemmas with relocation in assisted living: Philosophy vs. practice

Journal of Aging and Social Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 19-37

  Munroe, Donna J ^a   Guihan, Marylou ^b,c  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging in place; Assessment; Assisted living policy; Eligibility; Regulation; Relocation; Service plan

Indexed keywords

AGING; HEALTH CARE; POLICY MAKING; REGULATORY APPROACH;

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOME FOR THE AGED; HUMAN; MIGRATION; NURSING HOME; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE;

AGED; AGING; ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOMES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; NURSING HOMES; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY;

ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 30444453865     PISSN: 08959420     EISSN: 15450821     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J031v17n03_02     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq.
2. Assisted Living Federation of America (ALFA) (n.d.). About ALFA University. Retrieved February 12, 2004 from https://alfauniversity.com/ Access/
3. The Assisted Living Workgroup (ALW) (2003, April). Assuring quality in assisted living: Guidelines for federal and state policy, state regulation, and operations (Report to the US Senate Special Committee on Aging). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Community-Based Long Term Care Reform Task Force (1996, January). The longterm care constellation. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department on Aging.
5. Edelman, P., Guihan, M., Munroe, D. J., Miskevics, S., Clark, K., & Erdman, J. M. (2003). The satisfaction of residents and family caregivers with key aspects of assisted living. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Frank, J. (2001). How long can I stay? The dilemma of aging in place in assisted living. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 15(7), 5-30.
7. General Accounting Office, U.S. Congress (1999). Assisted living: Quality of care and consumer protection issues in four states (GAO/ HEIS-99-27). Washington, DC: Author.
8. Hawes, C., Phillips, C. D., Rose, M., Holan, S., & Sherman, M. (2003). A national survey of assisted living facilities. The Gerontologist, 43(6), 875-882.
9. Kane, R. A., & Wilson, K. B. (2001). Assisted living at the crossroads: Principles for its future. Portland, OR: Jessie F. Richardson Foundation.
10. Kissam, S., Gifford, D. R., Mor, V., & Patry, G. (2003). Admission and continued-stay criteria for assisted living facilities. JAGS, 51, 1651-1654.
11. Mollica, R. L., & Jenkens, R. (2001). State assisted living practices and options: A guide for state policy makers. Oakland, CA: NCBDC Coming Home Program and National Academy for State Health Policy.
12. Morris, J. N., & Morris, S. A. (1992). The role of formal human services. Generations, 16(2), 41-48.1
13. Munroe, D. J., Guihan, M., Hynes, D., Erdman, J. M., Miskevics, S., & Edelman, P. (2001). Aging inplace: Assisted living models for mixed income senior housing. Final Report. Chicago, IL: The Retirement Research Foundation and The Chicago Community Trust.
14. National Academy for State Health Policy. (n.d.). State regulations for assisted living. Retrieved December 12, 2003 from http://www.nashp.org/_docdisp_page.cfm?LID= 38EC38EB-664A-11D6-BCF600A0CC558925
15. Olmstead v. L. C. (98-536) 527 U.S. 581 (1999).
16. Phillips, C. D., Munoz, Y., Sherman, M., Rose, M., Spector, W., & Hawes, C. (2003). Effects of facility characteristics on departures from assisted living: Results from a national study, The Gerontologist, 43(5), 690-696.
17. Pynoos, J., Cohen, E., & Bernhardt, S. (1987). Home modifications: Improvements that extend independence. In V. Regnier & J. Pynoos (Eds.), Housing the aged. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.
18. Utz, R. L. (2003). Assisted living: The philosophical challenges of everyday practice. JAG, 22(3), 379-404.
19. Wilson, K. B. (1996). Assisted living: Reconceptualizing regulation to meet consumers' needs and preferences. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.