The initial development of the WebMedQual scale: Domain assessment of the construct of quality of health web sites

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-57

  Provost, Mélanie ^a   Koompalum, Dayin ^a   Dong, Diane ^a   Martin, Bradley C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet; Measurement; Psychometrics methods; Quality; Rating information; Scale

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; MEASUREMENTS; STANDARDS; WEBSITES;

PSYCHOMETRICS/METHODS; QUALITY; RATING INFORMATION; SCALE;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PANEL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY;

INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 30444453654     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.034     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. PEW Internet Project, December 2002 Survey, in: Daily Internet Activity, http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/chart.asp?img=Daily_A8.htm [accessed March 2003].
2. H. Taylor, and R. Leitman Four-nation survey shows widespread but different levels of Internet use for health purposes HarrisInteractive Health Care Res. 2 11 2002 4 http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/ healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2002Vol2_Iss11.pdf
3. H. Taylor, and R. Leitman No significant change in the numbers of "Cyberchondriacs" - those who go online for health care information HarrisInteractive Health Care Res. 3 4 2003 4 http://www.harrisinteractive.com/ news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2003Vol3_Iss04.pdf
4. M. Madden, L. Rainie, America's Online Pursuits: the changing pictures of who's online and what they do, PEW Internet and American Life Project, December 22, 2003, http://www.pewinternet.org/reports//toc.asp?Report=106 [accessed March 2004].
5. L. Baker, T.H. Wagner, S. Singer, and M.K. Bundorf Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information JAMA 289 18 2003 2400 2406
6. URAC, American Accreditation HealthCare Commission, Washington, DC, USA, http://www.urac.org [accessed March 2003].
7. M.A. Winker, A. Flanagin, B. Chi-Lum, J. White, K. Andrews, R.L. Kennett, C.D. DeAngelis, and R.A. Musacchio Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA web sites, American Medical Association (AMA) JAMA 283 12 2000 1600 1606
8. Commission of the European Communities, eEurope 2002: quality criteria for health related websites, J. Med. Internet Res. 4(2) (2002) e15, http://www.jmir.org/2002/3/e15/index.htm.
9. Health On the Net Foundation (HON), Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.hon.ch [accessed March 2001].
10. HONcode of Conduct, Health On the Net Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland, Version 1.6, April 1997, http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html [accessed February 17 2003].
11. R. Smith The invention of talk BMJ 324 2002 http://bmj.com/cgi/content/ full/324/7337/0/j
12. T. Ferguson From patients to end users: quality of online patient networks needs more attention than quality of online health information BMJ 324 2002 555 556 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/555
13. G.P. Purcell, P. Wilson, and T. Delamothe The quality of health information on the Internet: as for any other medium it varies widely; the regulation is not the answer BMJ 324 2002 557 558 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/ cgi/content/full/324/7337/557
14. P.R. Helft, F. Hlubocky, and C.K. Daugherty American oncologists' views of Internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members J. Clin. Oncol. 21 2003 942 947 http://www.jco.org/ cgi/content/full/21/5/942
15. S. Barrett, QuackWatch, Allentown, PA, USA, http://www.quackwatch.org/ [accessed March 2003].
16. F. Charatan Buyer beware" remains US policy towards information on the net BMJ 324 2002 566 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/ 566
17. S. Athanaselis, M. Stefanidou, N. Karakoukis, and A. Koutselinis Asphyxial death by ether inhalation and plastic-bag suffocation instructed by the press and the Internet J. Med. Internet Res. 4 3 2002 e18 http://www.jmir.org/2002/3/e18/
18. R. Smith Almost no evidence exists that the Internet harms health BMJ 323 2001 651
19. R. Kiley Does the Internet harm health? Some evidence exists that the Internet does harm health BMJ 324 2002 238 239
20. A.G. Crocco, M. Villasis-Keever, and A.R. Jadad Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the Internet JAMA 287 2002 2869 2871
21. G. Eysenbach, and C. Köhler Does the Internet harm health? Database of adverse events related to the Internet has been set up BMJ 324 2002 239
22. G. Eysenbach, C. Köhler, DAERI Database Adverse Events Related to the Internet, Heidelberg, Germany, http://www.medcertain.org/daeri/ [accessed March 2003].
23. G. Eysenbach, J. Powell, O. Kuss, and E.R. Sa Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review JAMA 287 2002 2691 2700
24. W.M. Silberg, G.D. Lundberg, and R.A. Musacchio Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet JAMA 277 1997 1244 1245
25. M. Martin-Facklam, M. Kostrzewa, F. Schubert, C. Gasse, and W.E. Haefeli Quality markers of drug information on the Internet: an evaluation of sites about St. John's wort Am. J. Med. 113 2002 740 745
26. G.K. Berland, M.N. Elliott, L.S. Morales, J.I. Algazy, R.L. Kravitz, M.S. Broder, and D.E. Kanouse Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish JAMA 285 2001 2612 2621
27. M. Craigie, B. Loader, R. Burrows, and S. Muncer Reliability of health information on the Internet: an examination of experts' ratings J. Med. Internet Res. 4 2002 e2 http://www.jmir.org/2002/1/e2/
28. A. Risk, and C. Petersen Health information on the Internet: quality issues and international initiatives JAMA 287 2002 2713 2715 http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/287/20/2713
29. L. Crocker, and J. Algina Introduction to Classical & Modern Test Theory 1986 Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Orlando, FL
30. J.C. Wyatt Commentary: measuring quality and impact on the World Wide Web BMJ 314 1997 1879 1881
31. A. Gagliardi, and A.R. Jadad Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the Internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination BMJ 324 2002 569 573
32. F. Meric, E.V. Bernstam, N.Q. Mirza, K.K. Hunt, F.C. Ames, M.I. Ross, H.M. Kuerer, R.E. Pollock, M.A. Musen, and S.E. Singletar Breast cancer on the World Wide Web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites BMJ 324 2002 577 581
33. P. Impicciatore, C. Pandolfini, N. Casella, and M. Bonati Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home BMJ 314 1997 1875 1879
34. C. Pandolfini, P. Impicciatore, and M. Bonati Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children Pediatrics 105 2000 e1
35. A. Cooke, and L. Gray Evaluating the quality of internet-based information about alternative therapies: development of the BIOME guidelines J. Public Health Med. 24 2002 261 267
36. L. Li, E. Irvin, J. Guzman, and C. Bombardier Surfing for back pain patients: the nature and quality of back pain information on the Internet Spine 26 2001 545 557
37. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 176, SIO 8402: Quality Management and Quality Assurance - Vocabulary, 2nd ed., International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1994.
38. G. Eysenbach, and T. Diepgen Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information BMJ 317 1998 1496 1500
39. ®, Medical Subject Headings 2003, National Library of Medicine, USA, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ [accessed March 2003].
40. G.A. Churchill A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs J. Mark. Res. 16 1979 64 73
41. A. Jadad, and A. Gagliardi Rating health information on the Internet, navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 279 1998 611 614
42. T. Kim, R.E. Thomas, M.J. Deering, and A. Maxfield Published criteria for evaluating health related Web sites: review BMJ 318 1999 647 649
43. AARP (formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons), Washington, DC, USA, http://www.AARP.org [accessed March 2001].
44. J. Alexander, M.A. Tate, How to recognize an informational Web page, Widener University, Wolfgram Memorial Library, July 1996, http://www.science. widener.edu/∼withers/inform.htm [accessed March 2001].
45. Altimed/PharmaLinks, Rating criteria, Mississauga, Ont., Canada, http://www.altimed.com/links/ratings.html [accessed March 2001] [inaccessible February 2003].
46. D. D'Allessandro, Criteria for World Wide Web selection and inclusion, General Pediatrics, http://www.generalpediatrics.com/Mission.html#Criteria [accessed March 2001].
47. M.P. D'Allessandro, About MedicalStudent.com, MedicalStudent, http://www.medicalstudent.com/#about [accessed March 2001].
48. Growth House, Rating criteria and excellence awards, http://www. growthhouse.org/award.html [accessed March 2001].
49. Healthfinder, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other U.S. Federal agencies, http://www.healthfinder.gov/aboutus/selectionpolicy.htm [accessed March 2001].
50. HealthWeb Project, Health sciences libraries of the Greater Midwest Region (GMR) of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NN/LM) and those of the Committee for Institutional Cooperation, http://healthweb.org/index.cfm [accessed March 2001].
51. J.E. Kotecki, and D.E. Siegel Electronic notes: use of a critical thinking/questioning approach to evaluate WWW information Am. J. Health Behav. 22 1998 75 76
52. M. Larkin, Health information on-line, FDA Consumer 30 (1996) 21-25, http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/596_info.html [accessed March 2001].
53. Lehigh, http://www.lib.lehigh.edu/evaluating.web.html [accessed March 2001].
54. McGill University Health Sciences and Osler libraries, Internet Resources Selection Criteria, Canada, http://www.health.library.mcgill.ca/resource/ criteria.htm [accessed March 2001].
55. Medical Matrix, Sample Resource Evaluation Form, Updated 24 April 2000, http://www.medmatrix.org/info/sitesurvey.html [accessed February 2001].
56. Net Wellness used the Health Summit I and II meetings criteria, http://www.mitretek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/criteria.html [accessed March 2001].
57. NOAH: New YorkOnline Access to Health, http://www.noah-health.org/ english/collection.html [accessed March 2001].
58. OMNI: Organizing Medical Networked Information, Summary of Key Evaluation Questions, http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/summary.html [accessed February 2001].
59. L.N. Pealer, and S.M. Dorman Evaluating health-related web sites J. Sch. Health 67 1997 232 235
60. J.M. Grohol, Rating guidelines, Psych Central, http://www.grohol.com/ rateguid.htm [accessed March 2001].
61. Biosites, Pacific Southwest Regional Medical Library, Regents of the University of California, Selection Criteria for Internet Resources, http://www.library.ucsf.edu/biosites/help/guidelines.html [accessed March 2001, modified list accessed June 2002].
62. Tufts University Nutrition Navigator, About the Ratings, http://navigator.tufts.edu/ratings.html [accessed February 2001].
63. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Uchsc), http://www.uchsc.edu/csa/areahec/home/mapp/telehealth/wwweval.htm [accessed March 2001].
64. Wilton Library, http:www.wiltonlibrary.org/eval.asp [accessed March 2001].
65. R.M. Kaplan, and J.P. Anderson The general health policy model: an integrated approach B. Spilker Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials 1996 Raven Press New York 309 322
66. R.M. Kaplan, J.W. Bush, and C.C. Berry Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being Health Serv. Res. 11 1976 478 507
67. M. Zimmerman, and J.I. Mattia The psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaire: development, reliability and validity Comprehens. Psychiatry 42 2001 175 189
68. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistics notes: validating scales and indexes BMJ 324 2002 606 607
69. E. Fry The readability graph validated at primary levels Read. Teach. 22 1969 534 538
70. R. Flesch A new readability yardstick J. Appl. Psychol. 32 1948 221 233
71. Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Last Modified November 17 2003, http://www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/hipaa1/default.asp [accessed March 2004].
72. Health On the Net, HONcode of Conduct (HONcode) for Medical and Health Web sites, Last Modified 3 May 2005 [accessed June 2005].
73. URAC, American Accreditation HealthCare Commission, Washington, DC, USA, http://www.urac.org [accessed June 2005].