-
1
-
-
0035074933
-
Laparoscopic Orchidopexy: A review of a large clinical series
-
Chang B, Palmer LS, Franco I. Laparoscopic Orchidopexy: a review of a large clinical series. BJU Int 2001; 87: 490-493
-
(2001)
BJU Int
, vol.87
, pp. 490-493
-
-
Chang, B.1
Palmer, L.S.2
Franco, I.3
-
3
-
-
0032832170
-
Is preoperative laparoscopy useful for impalpable testis?
-
Ferro F, Spagnoli A, Zaccara A, De Vico A, La Sala E. Is preoperative laparoscopy useful for impalpable testis? J Urol 1999; 162: 995-996.
-
(1999)
J Urol
, vol.162
, pp. 995-996
-
-
Ferro, F.1
Spagnoli, A.2
Zaccara, A.3
De Vico, A.4
La Sala, E.5
-
4
-
-
4544374641
-
Initial scrotal incision for unilateral nonpalpable testis
-
Snodgrass W, Chen K, Harrison C. Initial scrotal incision for unilateral nonpalpable testis. J Urol 2004; 172: 1742-1745.
-
(2004)
J Urol
, vol.172
, pp. 1742-1745
-
-
Snodgrass, W.1
Chen, K.2
Harrison, C.3
-
5
-
-
8644255169
-
Successful outpatient management of the nonpalpable intra-abdominal testis with staged Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy
-
Dhanani NN, Cornelius D, Gunes A, Ritchey ML. Successful outpatient management of the nonpalpable intra-abdominal testis with staged Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy. J Urol 2004; 172: 2399-3401.
-
(2004)
J Urol
, vol.172
, pp. 2399-3401
-
-
Dhanani, N.N.1
Cornelius, D.2
Gunes, A.3
Ritchey, M.L.4
-
6
-
-
0032872301
-
Orchiopexy for imaplapble testis: High spermatic vessel ligation is a safe maneuver
-
King LR. Orchiopexy for imaplapble testis: High spermatic vessel ligation is a safe maneuver. J Urol 1998; 160: 2457-2460.
-
(1998)
J Urol
, vol.160
, pp. 2457-2460
-
-
King, L.R.1
-
7
-
-
1842510024
-
Treatment of high undscended testes by low spermatic vessel ligation: An alternative to the Fowler-stephens technique
-
Koff SA, Sethi PS. Treatment of high undscended testes by low spermatic vessel ligation: An alternative to the Fowler-stephens technique. J Urol 1996; 156: 799-803.
-
(1996)
J Urol
, vol.156
, pp. 799-803
-
-
Koff, S.A.1
Sethi, P.S.2
-
8
-
-
0029987820
-
Is inguinal exploration for impalpable testis an outdated operation?
-
Lakhoo K, Thomas DFM, Najmaldin AS. Is inguinal exploration for impalpable testis an outdated operation? Br J Urol 1996; 77: 452-454.
-
(1996)
Br J Urol
, vol.77
, pp. 452-454
-
-
Lakhoo, K.1
Thomas, D.F.M.2
Najmaldin, A.S.3
-
9
-
-
0033029644
-
The difficult orchiopexy: The value of the abdominal preperitoneal approach
-
Adam AS, Allaway AJ. The difficult orchiopexy: The value of the abdominal preperitoneal approach. BJU Int 1999; 83: 290-293
-
(1999)
BJU Int
, vol.83
, pp. 290-293
-
-
Adam, A.S.1
Allaway, A.J.2
-
10
-
-
0030762521
-
Two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy with laparoscopic clipping of the spermatic vessels
-
Law GS, Perez LM, Joseph DB. Two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy with laparoscopic clipping of the spermatic vessels. J Urol 1997; 158: 1205-1207.
-
(1997)
J Urol
, vol.158
, pp. 1205-1207
-
-
Law, G.S.1
Perez, L.M.2
Joseph, D.B.3
-
11
-
-
0035004599
-
Management of the impalpable testis: A six-year review together with a national experience
-
Williams EV, Appanna T, Foster ME. Management of the impalpable testis: A six-year review together with a national experience. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 320-322.
-
(2001)
Postgrad Med J
, vol.77
, pp. 320-322
-
-
Williams, E.V.1
Appanna, T.2
Foster, M.E.3
-
12
-
-
0031016713
-
The vanishing testis: Anatomical and histological findings
-
Merry C, Sweeney B, Puri P. The vanishing testis: Anatomical and histological findings. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 65-67.
-
(1997)
Eur Urol
, vol.31
, pp. 65-67
-
-
Merry, C.1
Sweeney, B.2
Puri, P.3
-
13
-
-
0141958062
-
Laparoscopy for nonpalpable testis
-
Alam S, Radhakrishnan J. Laparoscopy for nonpalpable testis. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1534-1536.
-
(2003)
J Pediatr Surg
, vol.38
, pp. 1534-1536
-
-
Alam, S.1
Radhakrishnan, J.2
-
15
-
-
0033891389
-
Laparoscopic orchiopexy without division of the spermatic vessels: Can it be considered the procedure of choice in cases of nonpalpable testis
-
Esposito C, Vallone G, Settimi A, Gonzalez Sabin MA, Amici G, Cusano T. Laparoscopic orchiopexy without division of the spermatic vessels: Can it be considered the procedure of choice in cases of nonpalpable testis. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 658-660.
-
(2000)
Surg Endosc
, vol.14
, pp. 658-660
-
-
Esposito, C.1
Vallone, G.2
Settimi, A.3
Gonzalez Sabin, M.A.4
Amici, G.5
Cusano, T.6
|