Recently Introduced Policy Instruments and Intervention Theories

Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 55-68

  Kautto, Petrus ^a   Simila, Jukka ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

policy instrument; program theory; regulation; recently introduced policy instruments evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444441956     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389005053191     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Braybrooke, D. and C. E. Lindblom (1963) A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.
2. Chen, H.-T. (1990) Theory Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Connell, J., A. Kubisch, L. Schorr and C. Weiss, eds (1995) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
4. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2001) ‘From Programme Theory to Constructivism. On Tragic, Magic and Competing Programmes’, Evaluation 7(3): 331-349.
5. European Commission (1992) ‘Exploratory Memorandum - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPC)’, Memo, estimated year of publication 1992.
6. European Commission (2003) ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: On the Road to Sustainable Production. Progress in Implementing Council Directive 96/61/EC Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control’, COM (2003) 354 Final 19.6.2003. Brussels: European Commission.
7. Glaser, B. and A. Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
8. Hildén, M., J. Lepola, P. Mickwitz, A. Mulders, M. Palosaari, J. Similä, S. Sjöblom and E. Vedung (2002) Evaluation of Environmental Policy Instruments - a Case Study of the Finnish Pulp & Paper and Chemical Industries. Monographs of the Boreal Environment Research, No. 21. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute.
9. Hildén, M., P. Kautto, P. Mickwitz and J. Similä (2003) ‘Ympäristönsuojelulain kaksi ensimmäistä vuotta - arvioinnin yhteenveto’, Ympäristöjuridiikka 24(1): 181-99.
10. Hoffman, A. J. (2001) From Heresy to Dogma. An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism, expanded edn. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Hoogerwerf, A. (1990) ‘Reconstructing Policy Theory’, Evaluation and Program Planning 13(3): 285-291.
12. Kautto, P. and M. Melanen (2004) ‘How Does Industry Respond to Waste Policy Instruments - Finnish Experiences’, Journal of Cleaner Production 12(1): 1-11.
13. King, A. (2000) ‘Organizational Response to Environmental Regulation: Punctuate Change or Autogenesis?’, Business Strategy and the Environment 9(4): 224-238.
14. Leeuw, F. L. (2003) ‘Reconstructing Program Theories: Methods Available and Problems to be Solved’, American Journal of Evaluation 24(1): 5-20.
15. Lenne, B. and H. Cleland (1987) ‘Describing Program Logic’, Program Evaluation Bulletin 2.
16. Melanen, M., P. Kautto, H. Saarikoski, M. Ilomäki and H. Yli-Kauppila (2002) ‘Finnish Waste Policy - Effects and Effectiveness’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 35(1-2): 1-15.
17. Mickwitz, P. (2002) ‘Effectiveness Evaluation of Environmental Policy: the Role of Intervention Theories’, Administrative Studies 21(4): 77-78.
18. Mickwitz, P. (2003) ‘A Framework for Evaluating Environmental Policy Instruments: Context and Key Concepts’, Evaluation 9(4): 415-436.
19. Patton, M. Q. (1997) Utilization-focused Evaluation. The New Century Text, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Pawson, R. (2002) ‘Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a Method’, Evaluation 8(2): 157-181.
21. Pawson, R. (2003) ‘Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory’, Evaluation 9(4): 471-490.
22. Rogers, P. J., A. Petrosino, T. A. Huebner and T. A. Hasci (2000) ‘Program Theory Evaluation: Practice, Promise, and Problems’, in P. J. Rogers, T. Hacsi and A. Petrosino (eds) Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities, New Directions for Evaluation, 87: 5-13. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Rose, R. and T. Karran (1987) Taxation by Political Inertia: Financing the Growth of Government in Britain. London: Allen & Unwin.
24. Rossi, P. H., H. E. Freeman and M. W. Lipsey (1999) Evaluation. A Systematic Approach, 6th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Similä, J. and M. Hildén (2003) ‘Yhdennetty ympäristölupa - ympäristönsuojelulakiuudistuksen vaikutukset’. Ympäristöjuridiikka 24(1): 4-26.
26. Suchman, E. A. (1967) Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Sverdrup, S. (2003) ‘Towards an Evaluation of the Effects of Laws. Utilising Time-series Data of Complaints’, Evaluation 9(3): 325-339.
28. Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29. Vedung, E. and M. Román (2002) ‘Intervention Theory Evaluation of Global Environmental Regimes’, Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society conference, Seville, Spain, 10-12 October.
30. Weiss, C. H. (1997) ‘How Can Theory-based Evaluation Make a Greater Headway?’, Evaluation Review 21(4): 501-524.