Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 503-512

  Huang, Wen Jeng ^b   Taylor, Reginald W ^a   Dasanayake, Ananda P ^a  

^a Univ of Alabama School of Dentistry   (United States)

^b Department of Radiology   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

African Americans; Caucasians; Cephalometric analysis; Skeletal discrepancy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NEGRO; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; AGE FACTORS; ALABAMA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 3042928460     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Freeman RS. Adjusting A-N-B angle to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod 1981, 51:161-71.
2. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66.
3. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40.
4. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162-82.
5. Ricketts RM, Schulhof RJ, Bagha L. Orientation-sella or Frankfort horizontal. Am J Orthod 1976;69:648-654.
6. Beatty EJ. A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships. Am J Orthod 1975;68:303-15.
7. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975;67:125-138.
8. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC Longitudinal change in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal, clinical application. Am J Orthod 1983;84:133-39.
9. Jarvinen S. An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: A statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod 1985;87:144-6.
10. Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Sanders, 1982.
11. Nanda RS. Growth changes in skeletal-facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1971;59:501-13.
12. Jacobson A. Update on the Wits appraisal. Angle Orthod 1988;59:205-19.
13. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, Wits, AF-BF and APDI measurements Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;99:122-28.
14. Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;92:117-22.
15. Hussel W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod 1984;85:411-23.
16. Harvold E. Some biologic aspects of orthodontic treatment in the transitional dentition. Am J Orthod 1963;49:1-14.
17. Hussel W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod 1984;85:411-23.
18. Rushton R, Cohen AM, Alinney AD. The relationship and reproducibility of the angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br J Orthod 1991;18:225-31.
19. Nanda RS, Merrill RM. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105:328-44.
20. Jacobson A, Preston CB, Boettner VA, Pereira CB. The craniofacial pattern of the Lengua Indians of Paraguay. Am J Physical Anthrop 1977:47:467-72.
21. Limson M. Observations on the bones of the skull in White and Negro fetuses and infants. Carnegie Institute in Washington, 1935;136:205-222.
22. Altemus LA. Comparative integumental relationships. Angle Orthod 1963;33:217-221.
23. Cotton WN, Takano WS, Wong MW and Wylie WL. The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle Orthod 1951;21:213-220.
24. Drummond RA. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod 1968;54:670-682.
25. Fonseca R and Klein D. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Am J Orthod 1978;73(2):152-160.
26. Gormley M, Carlo J, Reardon J. Cronio-skeletal morphology for a segment of the black urban population using sella nasion as a cranial base line. Dental Science and Research 1975;3(8):67-69.
27. Alexander TL, Hitchcock HP. Cephalometric standards for American Negro children. Am J Orthod 1978;74:298-304.
28. Connor A, Moshiri F. Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod 1985;87(2):119-134.
29. Altemus LA. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 1960;30:223-239.
30. Flynn T, Ambrogio R, Zachner S. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:30-38.
31. Ow RKK, Djeng SK, Ritchie GM. A radiographic interpretation of craniofacial reference lines in relation to prosthodontic plane orientation. Aust Dent J 1986;31:326-34.
32. Ow RKK, Djeng SK, Ho CK. The relationship of upper facial proportion and the plane of occlusion to anatomic reference. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:727-33.
33. Yen PKJ. The facial configuration in a sample of Chinese boys. Adult Orthod 1973;43:301-4.
34. Ricketts RM, et al. Orthodontic diagnosis and planning. Denver, Colo: Rocky Mountain Data System, Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, 1982:79-147.
35. Wei SHY. Craniofacial variation, sex difference and the nature of prognathism in Chinese subjects. Angle Orthod 1969;39:303-15.
36. Chan GKH: A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese (Cantonese). Am J Orthod 1972;61:279-85.
37. Chan GKH. Class III malocclusion in Chinese (Cantonese): Etiology and treatment. Am J Orthod 1974;65:152-57.
38. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 1959;29(2):93-104.
39. Altemus LA. Comparative integumental relationships. Angle Orthod 1963;33(3);217-221.
40. Sushner NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977;72(4):373-385.
41. Bishara SE. Maxillofacial growth and development, Chap 5. In: The methods of analysis. University of Iowa Press, 1978.
42. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. The cephalometric evaluation of the orthodontic patient. In: McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL, eds. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition. Ann Arbor, Mich: Needham Press, 1993, 13-54.
43. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:79-90.
44. Roth B. The "Wits" appraisal, its skeletal and dentoalveolar background. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:21-28.
45. Hall-Scott J. The maxillary-mandibular planes (MMÚ) bisector: A new reference plane for anteroposterior measurement of the dental bases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105:583-591.
46. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Hunter WE. An atlas of craniofacial growth: Cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, 1974.
47. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WY. Bolton standards of dentofacial development growth. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975.
48. Bishara SE. Longitudinal cephalometric standards from 5 years of age to adulthood. Am J Orthod 1981;79:35-44.
49. Jamison JE, Bishara SE, Peterson LC, Dekock WH, Kremenak CR. Longitudinal changes in the maxilla and the maxillary-mandibular relationship between 8 and 17 years of age. Am J Orthod 1982;82:217-230.
50. Sherman SL, Woods M, Nanda RS. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:429-436.