Methodological issues and practices in measuring perinatal alcohol and other drug treatment outcomes

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 435-452

  Berkowitz, Gale ^a   Peterson, Sara ^a   Brindis, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Drugs; Measurement; Outcomes; Perinatal; Treatment; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042894627     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/16066359809026061     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bale RN, Van Stone WW, Engelsing TM, Zarcone VP & Kuldau JM (1981). The validity of self-reported heroin use. International Journal of the Addictions, 16(8), 1387-98.
2. Beckman L (1978). The psychosocial characteristics of alcoholic women and drug abuse. Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Review, 1(5/6), 1-12.
3. Berkowitz G, Brindis C, and Peterson S. (1995). Evaluation of the Perinatal Services Network: Final Evaluation Report. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California.
4. Buchi KF, Varner MW & Chase RA (1993). The prevalence of substance abuse among pregnant women in Utah. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 81(2), 23942.
5. Chasnoff IJ, Landress HJ & Barrett ME (1990). The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. The New England Journal of medicine, 322(17), 1202-1206.
6. Coletti SD, Hughes PH, Landress HJ, Neri RL, Sicilian DM, Williams KM, Urmann CF & Anthony JC (1992). PAR village: Specialized intervention for cocaine abusing women and their children. Journal of the Florida Medical Association, 79(10), 701-705.
7. Copeland J, Hall W, Didcott P & Biggs V (1993). A comparison of a specialist women's alcohol and other treatment service with two traditional mixed-sex services: Client characteristics and treatment outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 32, 81-92.
8. Cuskey W, Berger L & Densen-Gerber J (1977). Issues in the treatment of female addiction. A Review and Critique of the Literature, 6(3), 307-371.
9. Doshan T & Bursch C (1982). Women and substance abuse: Critical issues in treatment design. Journal of Drug Education, 12(3), 229-239.
10. Finkelstein N (1994). Treatment issues for alcohol- and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health & Social Work, 19(1), 7-15.
11. Forman S & Linney JA (1991). Increasing the Validity of Self-Report Data in Effectiveness Trials. In CG Leukefeld & WJ Bukoski (Eds.), Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodological Issues, National Institute of Drug Abuse Research Monograph 107, 235-47.
12. Gerstein DR, Johnson LA, Harwood HJ, Fountain D, Suter N & Mallory K (1994). Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CAL-DATA). Report submitted to the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
13. Gilchrist LD & Gillmore MR (1992). Methodological Issues in Prevention Research on Drug Use and Pregnancy. In MM Kilbey & K Asgha- (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 117, 18-30.
14. Glatt M (1978). Reflections on the treatment of alcoholism in women. British Journal on Alcohol and Alcoholism, 14(2), 77-83.
15. Graham K (1994). Guidelines for using standardized outcome measures following addictions treatment. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 17(1), 43-59.
16. Harrell AV (1985). Validation of Self-Report: the Research Record. In BA Rouse, NJ Kozel & LG Richards (Eds.), Self-Report Methods of Estimating Drug Use: Meeting Current Challenges to Validity, National Institute on Drub Abuse Research Monograph 57, 12-21.
17. Harrison ER, Haaga J & Richards T (1993). Self-reported drug use data: what do they reveal. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 19(4), 423-41.
18. Jessup M & Green J (1987). Treatment of the pregnant alcohol-dependent woman. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 19(2), 193-202.
19. Kaubin B (1974). Sexism shades the lives and traits of female addicts. Contemporary Drug Problems, 3(4), 471-484.
20. Lake MF, Angel JL, Murphy JM & Poekert G (1992). Patterns of illicit drug use at the time of labor in a private and public hospital. Journal of Perinatology, 12(2), 134-6.
21. Magura S, Goldsmith D, Casriel C, Goldstein PJ & Lipton DS (1987). The validity of methadone clients' self-reported drug use. International Journal of the Addictions, 22(8), 727-49.
22. Mandel L, Schulman J & Monteiro R (1979). A feminist approach for the treatment of drug abusing women in a coed therapeutic community. The International Journal of the Addictions, 14(5), 589-597.
23. McLellan AT (1992). Measurement Issues in the Evaluation of Experimental Treatment Interventions. In MM Kilbey & K Asghar (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 117, 31-40.
24. Nunes-Dinis M & Barth RP (1993). Cocaine treatment and outcome. Social Work, 38(5),611-18.
25. O'Campo P, De Boer MA, Faden RR, Gielen AC, Kass N & Chaisson R (1992). Discrepancies between women's personal interview data and medical record documentation of illicit drug use, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV infection. Medical Care, 30(10), 965-71.
26. Ostrea EM (1992). Detection of Prenatal Drug Exposure in the Pregnant Woman and Her Newborn Infant. In MM Kilbey & K Asghar (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 117, 61-79.
27. Reed B (1987). Developing women-sensitive drug dependence treatment services: Why so difficult? Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 19(2), 151-164.
28. Seiden A (1992). Measures of Pregnant, Drug-Abusing Women for Treatment Research. In MM Kilbey & K Asghar (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 117, 194-211.
29. Senate Select Committee on Children and Youth (1990). Task force on substance exposed Infants: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Joint Publications Office.
30. Smith IE (1992). A comparison study of treated and untreated pregnant and post-partum cocaine-abusing women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9(4), 343-8.
31. Tracy C, Talbert D & Steinschneider J (1990). Women, Babies and Drugs: Family-Centered Treatment Options. Center for Policy Alternatives, National Conference of State Legislatures, 1-31.
32. Vaughn AJ, Carzoli RP, Sanchez-Ramos L, Murphy S, Kahn N & Chiu T (1993). Community-wide estimation of illicit drug use in delivering women: prevalence, demographics, and associated risk factors. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 82(1), 92-6.
33. Vega WA, Kolody B, Nobie A, Hwang J, Porter P, Bole A & Dimas J (1992). Profile of alcohol and drug use during pregnancy in California, 1992. Sacramento, CA: Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
34. Vega WA, Kology B, Hwang J & Nobel A (1993). Prevalence and magnitude of perinatal substance exposures in California. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(12), 850-4.
35. Winter KC, Stinchfield RD, Henly GA & Schwartz RH (1991). Validity of adolescent self-report of alcohol and other drug involvement. International Journal of the Addictions, 25(11A), 1379-95.