One size does not fit all: Aptitude x treatment interaction (ATI) as a conceptual framework for complementary and alternative medicine outcome research. Part 1 - What is ATI research?

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 580-586

  Caspi, Opher ^a,b   Bell, Iris R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; APTITUDE; CONCEPT FORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW;

EID: 3042855328     PISSN: 10755535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/1075553041323812     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Barlow DH, O'Brien FT, Last CG. Couples treatment of agoraphobia: initial outcome. In: Craig KD, McMahon RJ, eds. Advances in Clinical Behavior Therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1984.
2. Bell IR, Caspi O, Schwartz GRE, Grant KL, Rychener D, Gaudet TW, Maizes V, Weil AT. Integrative medicine and systematic outcomes research: Issues in the emergence of a new model for primary health care. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:133-140.
3. Beutler LE. Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.'s verdict. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59: 226-232.
4. Carr AJ, Gibson B, Robinson PG. Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? BMJ 2001;322:1240-1243.
5. Caspi O. Integrated medicine: Orthodox meets alternative. Bringing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into main-stream is not integration. BMJ 2001;322:168.
6. Caspi O, Bootzin RR. Evaluating how placebos produce change: Logical and causal traps and understanding cognitive explanatory mechanisms. Eval Health Prof 2002;25:436-464.
7. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Roccella EJ, The National High Blood Pressure Euducation Program Coordinating Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure. The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289: 2560-2572.
8. Cronbach, LJ. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 1957;12:671-684.
9. Cronbach, LJ, Snow RE. Aptitude and Instructional Methods: A handbook for Research on Interactions. New York, NY: Irvington, 1977.
10. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Thomas H. The role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:3.
11. Dance KA, Neufeld RWJ. Aptitude-treatment interaction research in the clinical setting: A review of attempts to dispel the "patient uniformity" myth. Psychol Bull 1988;104:192-213.
12. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet 2001;357:757-762.
13. Edwards AL, Cronbach LJ. Experimental design for research in psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol 1952:8;51-59.
14. Goldie JH. Drug resistance in cancer: A perspective. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2001;20:63-68.
15. Gregerson MB, Roberts IM, Amiri MM. Absorption and imagery locate immune responses in the body. Biofeedback Self Regul 1996;21:149-165.
16. Grünbaum A. Explication and implications of the placebo concept. In: White L, Tursky B, Schwartz GE eds. Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms. New York: Guilford Press, 1985:9-36.
17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
18. Kalauokalani D, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA. Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: Patient expectations and treatment effects. Spine 2001;26:1418-1424.
19. Karpman MB. The Johnson-Neyman technique using SPSS or BMDP. Educ Psychol Meas 1983;43:137-147.
20. Kiesler DJ. Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychol Bull 1966;65:110-136.
21. Luborsky L, Singer B, Luborsky L. Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that "everybody has won and all must have prizes"? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975;32:995-1008.
22. Mitchell A, Cormack M. Towards a model of treatment in health care. In: The Therapeutic Relationship in Complementary Health Care. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998:29-42.
23. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Integration of complementary and alternative medicine: A health services research perspective. RFA: AT-01-001, 2000. Online document at: grants2.nih.gov/grants/ guide/rfa-files/RFA-AT-01-001.html
24. National Institute of Mental Health. Psychotherapeutic interventions: How and why they work. A workshop by the National Institute of Mental Health. Rockville, Maryland, 2002. Online document at www.nimh.nih.gov/research/ interventions.cfm
25. Neff DF, Blanchard EB, Andrasik F. The relationship between capacity for absorption and chronic headache patients' response to relaxation and biofeedback treatment. Biofeedback Self Regul 1983;8:177-183.
26. Prochaska JO. How do people change, and how can we change to help many more people? In: Hubble DB, Miller, SD, ed. The Heart & Soul of Change: What Works in Therapy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1999:227-255.
27. Qualls PJ, Sheehan PW. Capacity for absorption and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback and no-feedback conditions. J Abnorm Psychol 1979;88:652-662.
28. Qualls PJ, Sheehan PW. Imagery engagement, absorption capacity, and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback. J Pers Soc Psychol 1981;41:370-379.
29. Redelmeier DA, Shafir E. Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA 1995;273:302-305.
30. Ridenour TA, Treloar JH, Biner PM, Henriksen LW, Dean RS. Attribute-treatment interaction research using nonexperimental data and the allocation average. Int J Neurosci 1999;99:19-47.
31. Rogosa D. Comparing nonparallel regression lines. Psychol Bull 1980;88:307-321.
32. Rohrbaugh M, Shoam V, Racioppo MW. Toward family-level attribute x treatment interaction (ATI) research. In: Lidle HA, Santisteban D, Levant RF, Bray JH, eds. Family Psychology: Science-Based Interventions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2002.
33. Room R. Intoxication and bad behavior: Understanding cultural differences in the link. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:189-198.
34. Shea JD. Effects of absorption and instructions on heart rate control. J Mental Imagery 1985;9:87.
35. Shoam V, Rohrbaugh M. Aptitude x treatment interaction (ATI) research: Sharpening the focus, widening the lens. In: Aveline M, Shapiro DA, eds. Research Foundation for Psychotherapy Practice. Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1975:73-95.
36. Shoam V, Rohrbaugh M. Promises and perils of empirically supported psychotherapy integration. J Psychother Integr 1996;6: 191-206.
37. Shoam-Salomon V. Introduction to special section on client-therapy interaction research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59: 203-204.
38. Shoam-Salomon V, Avner R, Neeman R. You're changed if you do and changed if you don't: Mechanisms underlying paradoxical interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:590-598.
39. Shoam-Salomon V, Hannah MT. Client-treatment interaction in the study of differential change processes. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:217-225.
40. Smith B, Sechrest L. Treatment of aptitude x treatment interactions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:233-244.
41. Snow RE. Aptitude processes. In: Snow RE, Federico P, Montague WE, eds. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction: Vol. 1: Cognitive Processes Analyses of Aptitude. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.
42. Snow RE. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:205-216.
43. Wallston KA, Stein MJ, Smith CA. Form C of the MHLC scales: A condition-specific measure of locus of control. J Pers Assess 1994;63:534-553.