The evolution of environmental legislation: A strategic transaction approach

Journal of Economic Issues

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 493-502

  Thomassin, Paul J ^a   Cloutier, L Martin ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Logistics and Transport   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042853928     PISSN: 00213624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2004.11506710     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bromley, D. W. Economic Interests and Institutions. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
2. Carpentier, C. L., and D. Erwin. Business Approaches to Agri-environmental Management: Incentives, Constraints, and Policy Issues. Paris: Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries, OECD, 2002.
3. Cloutier, L. Martin, and R. Rowley. "Simulation, Quantitative Economics, and Econometrics: Electronic Infrastructure and Challenges to Methodological Standards." European Journal of Economic and Social Systems 15 (2003): 221-239.
4. Cloutier, L. Martin, Paul J. Thomassin, F. Dagicour, and J.-C. Rodriguez. "Local Environmental Protection and Trade: Hog Production in Canada and Mexico." In Assessing the Environmental Effects of Trade, Montreal, QC: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, North American Free Trade Agreement, forthcoming.
5. Commons, John R. "Institutional Economics." American Economic Review 21 (1931): 648-657.
6. _. Institutional Economics. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961.
7. Coyle, C. "Qualitative and Quantitative Modelling in System Dynamics: Some Research Questions." System Dynamics Review 16 (2000): 225-244.
8. Forrester, J. W. "Policies, Decisions, and Information Sources for Modeling." In Modeling for Learning Organizations, edited by J. D. W. Morecroft and J. D. Sterman. Portland, Ore.: Productivity Press, 1994.
9. Ministère de l'agriculture, des pêcheries et de l'alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). Monographie de l'industrie porcine au Québec. Quebec City, QC, 1998.
10. OECD. Domestic and International Environment Impacts of Agricultural Trade Liberalisation. Document COM/AOR/ENV(2000)75/FINAL, 2000. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2000doc.nsf/LinkTo/com-agr-env(2000)75-final.
11. Radzicki, Michael J. "Methodologia Oeconomiae et Systematis Dynamis." System Dynamics Review 6 (1990): 123-147.
12. _. "Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and a Foundation for Evolutionary Economics." Journal of Economics Issues 37 (2003): 133-173.
13. Roberts, N., D. F. Andersen, R. M. Deal, M. S. Garet, and W. A. Shaffer. Introduction to Computer Simulation: A System Dynamics Modeling Approach. Portland, Ore.: Productivity Press, 1983.
14. Rutherford, M. "John R. Commons's Institutional Economics." Journal of Economic Issues 17 (1983): 721-744.
15. Statistics Canada. Livestock Production. Ottawa, ON: Supply and Services, 2002.
16. Thomassin, Paul J., and L. Martin Cloutier. "Informational Requirements and the Regulatory Process of Agricultural Biotechnology." Journal of Economic Issues 35 (2001): 323-333.
17. Union des producteurs agricoles (UPA). Nouveau jalon d'un contrat social. Presented at the commission sur le développement durable de la production porcine au Québec. Longueuil, QC: UPA, 2003.
18. Van Nieuwenhuyse, P. La dynamique de développement économique d'une industrie: Le cas de la filière porcine. Ministère de l'agriculture, pêcheries et alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ), Quebec City, QC, 2002.
19. Vennix, J. A. C. "Group Model Building: Tackling Messy Problems." System Dynamics Review 15 (1999): 379-401.
20. Weersink, A., J. Livernois, J. F. Shogen, and J. S. Shortle. "Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy in Agriculture." Canadian Public Policy 24 (1998): 309-327.