Searching large collections of recorded speech: A preliminary study

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 40, Issue , 2003, Pages 330-339

  Kim, Jinmook ^a   Oard, Douglas W ^a   Soergel, Dagobert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042853618     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450400141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Allan, James (ed). (2002). Topic Detection and Tracking: Event-Based Information Organization. Klewer Academic, Boston.
2. Arons, B. (1997). SpeechSkimmer: a system for interactively skimming recorded speech. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4 (1), 12-19.
3. Barry, C.L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (3), 149-159.
4. Christel, M., Wactlar, H., Steven, S., Sirbu, M., Reddy, R., Mauldin, M., and Kanade, T. (1995). Informedia digital video library. Communications of the ACM, 38 (4), 57-58.
5. Creswell, J.W, (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
6. Kim, J. and Oard, D.W. (2002). The use of speech retrieval systems: a study design. Coden, A.R., Brown, E.W., and Srinivasan, S. (Eds.), Information Retrieval Techniques for Speech Applications (pp. 86-93). LNCS 2273, Springer-Verlag.
7. Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications Inc.
8. Merlino, A., and Maybury, M. (1999). An empirical study of the optimal presentation of multimedia summaries of broadcast news. Mani, I., and Maybury, M. (Eds.), Automated Text Summarization (pp. 391-402). MIT Press.
9. Oard, D.W. (2000). User interface design for speech-based retrieval. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 26 (5), 20-22.
10. Park, T.K. (1993). The nature of relevance in information retrieval: an empirical study. Library Quarterly, 63 (3), 318-351.
11. Saracevic, T. (1976). Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Voigt, M.J., and Harris, M.H. (Eds.), Advances in Librarianship 6 (pp. 81-139).
12. Schamber, L. (1994). Relevance and information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 29, 1-48.
13. Stifelman, L., Arons, B., and Schmandt, C. (2001). The Audio Notebook: paper and pen interaction with structured speech. Proceedings of CHI 01 (pp. 182-189). Seattle, WA, ACM Press.
14. Tang, R., and Solomon, P. (2001). Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation: on the complementarity of experimental and naturalistic studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52 (8), 666-685.
15. Taylor, R. (1962). The process of asking questions. American Documentation, 391-396.
16. Thong, JM.V., Moreno, P., Logan, B., Fidler, B., Maffey, K., and Moores, M. (2002). SpeechBot: an experimental speech-based search engine for multimedia content in the Web. IEEE Transactions Multimedia Journal, 4(1).
17. Voorhees, E., and Harman, D. (2000). Overview of the Ninth Text Retrieval Conference. The Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9) (pp. 1-14). Gaithersburg, MD, NIST.
18. Wang, P. and Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project, Study I: document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (2), 115-133.
19. Whittaker, S., Hirschberg, J., Amento, B., Stark, L., Bacchiani, M., Isenhour, PI, Stead, L., Zamchick, G., and Rosenberg, A. (2002). SCANMail: a voicemail interface that makes speech browsable, readable and searchable. Proceedings of CH1 '02 (pp. 275-282). Minneapolis, MN, ACM Press.
20. Whittaker, S., Hirschberg, J., and Nakatani C.H. (1998). Play it again: a study of the factors underlying speech browsing behavior. Proceedings of ACM CHI '98. Los Angeles, CA, ACM Press.
21. Wilson, P. (1973). Situational relevance. Information Storage and Retrieval, 9, 457-471.
22. Wilson, T.D. (1994). The proper protocol: Validity and completeness of verbal report. American Psychological Society, 5(5), 249-251.