Keystroke dynamics identity verification - Its problems and practical solutions

Computers and Security

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 428-440

  Yu, Enzhe ^a   Cho, Sungzoon ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Autoassociative MLP; Ensemble based on feature selection; Feature subset selection; Keystroke dynamics identify verification; Novelty detection; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; CRYPTOGRAPHY; ERROR DETECTION; PERSONNEL TRAINING; VECTORS;

AUTOASSOCIATIVE MLP; FEATURE SUBSET SELECTION; KEYSTROKE DYNAMICS IDENTITY VERIFICATION; NOVELTY DETECTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 3042852406     PISSN: 01674048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine. 24:(2):1996;123-140.
2. Brown M., Rogers S.J. User identification via keystroke characteristics of typed names using neural networks. Int J Man Machine Stud. 39:1993;999-1014.
3. Byun H., Lee S. Applications of support vector machines for pattern recognition: a survey. LNCS. 2388:2002;213-236.
4. Cho S., Han C., Han D., Kim H. Web-based keystroke dynamics identity verification using neural network. J Organ Comput Electron Commerce. 10:(4):2000;295-307.
5. Dasarathy BV. Recognition under partial exposure and imperfect supervision. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society; 1979. p. 218-21.
6. Gaines R, Lisowski W, Press S, Shapiro N. Authentication by keystroke timing: some preliminary results. Rand Report R-256-NSF. Rand Corporation; 1980.
7. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. 1989;Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
8. Ho T.K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. 20:(8):1998;832-844.
9. http://www.biopassword.com.
10. Hwang B, Cho S. Characteristics of autoassociative MLP as a novelty detector. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, DC, USA; 1999.
11. Karp R.M. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Miller R.E., Thatcher J.W. Complexity of computer computations. 1972;Plenum Press, New York.
12. Leggett J., Williams G., Usnick M., Longnecker M. Dynamic identity verification via keystroke characteristics. Int J Man Machine Stud. 35:1991;859-870.
13. Obaidat M., Sadoun S. Verification of computer users using keystroke dynamics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B. 27:(2):1997;261-269.
14. Schölkopf B, Platt J, Shawe-Taylor J, Smola AJ, Williamson RC. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Technical Report MSR-TR-99-87. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA; 1999.
15. Schölkopf B., Williamson R.C., Smola A.J., Shawe-Taylor J., Platt J.C. Support vector method for novelty detection. Solla S.A., Leen T.K., Müller K.-R. Advances in neural information processing systems. vol. 12:2000;582-588 MIT Press.
16. Shapire R.E. The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning. 5:1990;197-227.
17. Smyth B., Cunningham P. The utility problem analysed: a case-based reasoning perspective. Smith I., Faltings B. EWCBR'96 Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. 1996;392-399 Springer-Verlag.
18. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. 1995;Springer- Verlag, New York.
19. Yang J., Honavar V. Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. Motoda H., Liu H. Feature extraction, in construction, and subset selection: a data mining perspective. 1998;Kluwer, New York.
20. Yao X., Liu Y. Making use of population information in evolutionary artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B. 28:(3):1998;417-425.
21. Yu E, Cho S. Novelty detection approach for keystroke dynamics identity verification. Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, IDEAL 2003 Hong Kong, China; 2003.