Changing trends in a decade of circumcision in Scotland

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1037-1039

  Quaba, O ^a   MacKinlay, G A ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Circumcision; incidence; phimosis; preputioplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CIRCUMCISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; PHIMOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; UNITED KINGDOM;

CIRCUMCISION, MALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTLAND;

EID: 3042845135     PISSN: 00223468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.03.061     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Williams N., Chell J., Kapila L. Why are children referred for circumcision? BMJ. 306:1993;28
2. Escala J.M., Rickwood A.M.K. Balanitis. Br J Urol. 63:1989;196-197
3. MacKinlay G.A. Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic. BMJ. 297:1988;590-591
4. Gairdner D.M. The fate of the foreskin. BMJ. 2:1949;1433-1437
5. Rickwood A.M.K., Walker J. Is phimosis over diagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 71:1989;275-277
6. Rickwood A.M.K., Kenny S.E., Donnell S.C. Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys Survey of trends in practice. BMJ. 321:2000;792-793
7. Wright J.E. The treatment of childhood phimosis with topical steroid. Aust N Z J Surg. 64:1994;327-328
8. Cuckow P.M., Rix G., Mouriquand P.D. Preputial plasty A good alternative to circumcision. J Pediatr Surg. 29:1994;561-563
9. Dennistoun G.C. Circumcision and the code of ethics. Humane Health Care International. 12:1996;78-80