A comparison of pressure ulcer prevalence: Concerted data collection in the Netherlands and Germany

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 607-612

  Tannen, Antje ^a   Dassen, Theo ^a   Bours, Gerrie ^b   Halfens, Ruud ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSE; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ULCER;

AGED; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRESSURE ULCER; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 3042842008     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arnold M., Klauber J., Schellschmidt H. Krankenhausreport 2002. 2003;Schattenhauer, Stuttgart, New York
2. Assenheimer, B.S.M., Schröder, G., 2000. Leitlinie Dekubitus 2000, Uslar- Sohlingen, p. 86.
3. Bergquist S. Braden Scale. validity in community-based older adults receiving home health care Applied Nursing Research. 14:2001;36-43
4. Bergstrom N., Braden B., Kemp M., Champagne M., Ruby E. Predicting pressure ulcer risk. a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale Nursing Research. 47:1998;261-269
5. Bienstein, C., 2000. Expertenstandard Dekubitusprophylaxe in der Pflege, Osnabrück.
6. Bours, G., Halfens, R., Wansink, S., 2002a. Landelijk Prevalentie Onderzoek Decubitus Resultaten vijfde jaarlijkse meting 2002. Universiteit maastricht, Sectie Verplegingswetenschap, Maastricht, p. 235.
7. Bours G.J., Halfens R.J., Abu-Saad H.H., Grol R.T. Prevalence, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers. descriptive study in 89 institutions in the Netherlands Research in Nursing and Health. 25:2002;99-110
8. Brüggemann, J., 2001. Grundsatzstellungnahme Dekubitus, Medizinisch-pflegerische Grundlagen- Prophylaxe und Therapie, Hamburg.
9. CBO, Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de gezondheidsorganisatie, 2002. Richtlijn.2e herz.dr.ed., Utrecht.
10. CBS, 2000. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen.
11. Dassen, T., 2002. Dekubitus, Sturzereignisse, Pflegeabhängigkeit, Prävalenzerhebung 2002. Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Medizin-/Pflegepädagogik und Pflegewissenschaft, Berlin, p. 99.
12. Deutsche Gesellschaft für physikalische Therapie, 2000. Dekubitustherapie und prophylaxe.
13. Fachgesellschaften A. d.W.M., 1999. Dekubitusprophylaxe und Therapie. In: Leitlinienregister, Hannover.
14. Halfens R.J., Van Achterberg T., Bal R.M. Validity and reliability of the Braden scale and the influence of other risk factors. a multi-centre prospective study International Journal of Nursing Studies. 37:2000;313-319
15. Halfens R.J., Bours G.J., Van Ast W. Relevance of the diagnosis stage 1 pressure ulcer. an empirical study of the clinical course of stage 1 ulcers in acute care and long-term care hospital populations Journal of Clinical Nursing. 10:2001;748-757
16. Kleinbaum D. Logistic regression. 1994;Springer, Berlin
17. Leffmann, C., Anders, J., Heinemann, A., Leutenegger, M., Pröfener, F., 2003. GBE Heft 12. Dekubitus. Robert Koch- Institut Statistisches Bundesamt. Berlin.
18. Lewicki L., Mion L., Secic M. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Braden Scale in the Cardiac Surgical Population. Journal of Wound Ostomy Continence Nursing. 28:2000;279-289
19. NPUAP, 2002. Incidence and Prevalence.
20. Pang S., Wong T. Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital. Nursing Research. 47:1998;147-153
21. VandenBosch T., Montoye C., Satwicz M., Durkee-Leonard K., Boylan-Lewis B. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale and Nurse Perception in Identifying Pressure Ulcer Risk. Applied Nursing Research. 9:1996;80-86
22. Zee J.v.d. Krankenhausreport 1999. 2000;Schattenhauer, Stuttgart, New York