Have the shifting sands of Fordism resulted in ground lost or ground gained for distance education?

Distance Education

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 247-266

  Stevens, Kay ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042837485     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0158791960170204     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Campion, M., 1993. ‘Post‐Fordism: Neither panacea nor placebo’. Open Learning, 8 (2): 59–60.
2. ——. 1995. ‘The supposed demise of bureaucracy: Implications for distance education and open learning ‐ more on the post‐Fordism debate’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 192–16.
3. 1996. ‘Post‐Fordism: Not a poison either!’. Open Learning, 11 (1): 41–6.
4. Campion, M., and Renner, W., 1992. ‘The supposed demise of Fordism: Implications for distance education and higher education’. Distance Education, 13 (1): 7–28.
5. Ding, X., 1995. ‘From Fordism to neo‐Fordism: Industrialisation theory and distance education ‐ a Chinese perspective’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 217–41.
6. Edwards, R., 1991. ‘The inevitable future? Post‐Fordism and open learning’. Open Learning, 6 (2): 36–42.
7. ——. 1995. ‘Different discourses, discourses of difference: Globalisation, distance education and open learning’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 241–55.
8. Evans, T., 1995. ‘Globalisation, post‐Fordism and open and distance education’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 256–69.
9. Evans, T., and Nation, D., 1992. ‘Theorising open and distance education’. Open Learning, 7 (2): 3–13.
10. Fames, N., 1993. ‘Modes of production: Fordism and distance education’. Open Learning, 8 (1): 10–20.
11. Field, J., 1995. ‘Globalisation, consumption and the learning business’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 270–83.
12. Freire, P., 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
13. Fritsch, H., 1995. ‘A comment upon Fordism in distance education in relation to the reunification process in Germany’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 302–8.
14. Garrison, D.R., and Shale, D., 1987. ‘Mapping the boundaries of distance education: Problems in defining the field’. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1 (1): 7–13.
15. Giddens, A., 1991. Modernity and Self‐Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. ——. 1995. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, London: Macmillan.
17. Habermas, J., 1982. “ ‘A reply to my critics’ ”. In Habermas: Critical Debates, Edited by: Thompson, J., and Held, D., Massachusetts: MIT Press.
18. ——. 1987. Knowledge and Human Interests, Cambridge: Polity Pressy.
19. ——. 1989. The New Conservatism, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
20. Harris, D., 1987. Openness and Closure in Distance Education, London: Falmer Press.
21. Hekman, S., 1986. Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge, Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Jarvis, P., 1996. ‘Distance education in a late modern society: A response to Greville Rumble’. Open Learning, 11 (1): 47–50.
23. Keegan, D., 1983. Six Distance Education Theorists, Hagen: FernUniversität Gesamthochschule.
24. Keegan, D., ed. 1994. Otto Peters on distance education: The industrialization of teaching and learning, London: Routledge.
25. Kneller, G.F., 1964. Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York: John Wiley.
26. Laureys, G., 1992. ‘Mobility has come to stay’. Higher Education Management, 4 (1): 108–20.
27. Lyotard, J., 1979. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28. Marcuse, H., 1972. One Dimensional Man, London: Abacus.
29. Peters, O., 1989. ‘The iceberg has not melted: Further reflections on the concept of industrialisation and distance teaching’. Open Learning, 4 (3): 3–8.
30. ——. 1996. ‘Distance education is a form of teaching and learning sui generis’. Open Learning, 11 (1): 51–4.
31. Raggatt, P., 1993. ‘Post‐Fordism and distance education ‐ a flexible strategy for change’. Open Learning, 8 (1): 21–31.
32. Renner, W., 1995. ‘Post‐Fordist visions and technological solutions: Educational technology and the labour process’. Distance Education, 16 (2): 284–301.
33. Rumble, G., 1995a. ‘Labour market theories and distance education I: Industrialisation and distance education’. Open Learning, 10 (1): 10–20.
34. ——. 1995b. ‘Labour market theories and distance education II: How Fordist is distance education?’. Open Learning, 10 (2): 12–28.
35. ——. 1995c. ‘Labour market theories and distance education III: Post‐Fordism ‐ the way forward?’. Open Learning, 10 (3): 25–43.
36. Sewart, D., 1995. Book Review of ‘Otto Peters on Distance Education. The Industrialization of Teaching and Learning’. Open Learning, 10 (2): 62–3.