Sex ratio of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) - Facts and artifacts

European Journal of Entomology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 341-344

  Adamski, Pawel ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF NATURE CONSERVATION   (Poland)

Author keywords

Activity; Apollo butterfly; Effective population size; Mark recapture; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CAPTIVE POPULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; POPULATION SIZE; SEX RATIO; WILD POPULATION;

CARPATHIANS; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; MALOPOLSKIE; PIENINY NATIONAL PARK; POLAND; WESTERN CARPATHIANS;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONIDAE; PARNASSIINAE; PARNASSIUS; PARNASSIUS APOLLO;

EID: 3042823077     PISSN: 12105759     EISSN: 18028829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2004.046     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ADAMSKI P. & WITKOWSKI Z. 1999a: Monitoring of local population of the apollo butterfly in the Pieniny Mountains as an example of LTER. In Bijok P. & Prus M. (eds): Long Term Ecological Research, Examples, Methods, Perspectives for Central Europe. Proc. I LTER Reg. Workshop, September 1999, Ma̧dralin (Warsaw), Poland. US LTER Network Office, Dziekanów Leśny, pp. 137-141.
2. ADAMSKI P. & WITKOWSKI Z. 1999b: Wing deformation in isolated Carpathian population of Parnasius apollo (Papilionidae: Parnassiinae). Nota Lepid. 22(1): 67-73
3. ADAMSKI P., WITKOWSKI Z., KOSIOR A. & OLEŚ T. 2002: Ten years of restitution of Apollo butterfly in Pieniny National Park - analysis of the projeckt effectiveness. In Karwowski K. (ed.): Badania Naukowe w Pieninach 2002. [Scientific Research in the Pieniny Mts 2002.] Pieniny National Park, Krościenko n/D, 21 pp. (in Polish).
4. ANHOLT B.R. 1997: Sexual size dimorphism and sex-specific survival in adults of the damselfly Lestes disjunctus. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 127-132.
5. BROMMER J.E. & FRED M.S. 1999: Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 125-131.
6. BROOK B.W., BURGMAN M.A. & FRANKHAM R. 2000: Differences and congruencies between PVA packages: the importance of sex ratio for predictions of extinction risk Conserv. Ecol. 4 (1), 6. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/issl/art6
7. CAUGHLEY G. & GUNN A. 1996: Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 163-220.
8. DANKOVÁ K. 2002: Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo) in the Pieniny Mts. In Karwowski K. (ed.): Badania Naukowe w Pieninach 2002. [Scientific Research in the Pieniny Mts 2002.] Pieniny National Park, Krościenko n/D, 23 pp. (in Slovak).
9. FJELLSTAD W. 1996: Flight patterns and population structure of Parnassius apollo, in a Norwegian cultural landscape. In Pulin A. (ed.): Butterfly Conservation. 2nd Int. Symp., University of Warwick, September. Book of Abstracts. University of Warwick, p. 33.
10. KNUTSON R.L., KWILOSZ J.R. & GRUNDEL R. 1999: Movement patterns and population characteristics of the Kanner blue butterfly (Lyceaides melissa samuelis) at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Nat. Area J. 19: 109-120.
11. KONVICKA M. & KURAS T. 1999: Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosynae in Litovelské Pomoravi, Czech Republic. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 211-223.
12. MATTER S.F. & ROLAND J. 2002: An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 308-316.
13. MAXWELL M.R. 1998: Seasonal adult sex ratio shift in the praying mantid Iris oratoria (Mantodea: Mantidae). Environ. Entomol. 27: 318-323.
14. MCCARTHY M.A., FRANKLIN D.C. & BURGMAN M.A. 1994: The importance of demographic uncertainty: an example from the helmet honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops cassidix. Biol. Conserv. 67: 135-142.
15. REE D.H., O'GRADY J.J., BROOK B.W., BALLOU J.D. & FRANKHAM R. 2003: Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biol. Conserv. 113: 23-34.
16. SCHTICKZELLE N., BAGUETTE M. & LE BOULENGE E. 2003: Modelling insect demography from capture-recapture data: comparison between the constrained linear models and the Jolly-Seber analytical method. Can. Entomol. 135: 313-323.
17. SEBER G.A.F. 1982: The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters. Charles Griffin, London, pp. 161-230.
18. STOKS R. 2001a: What causes male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 188-197.
19. STOKS R. 2001b: Male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations: real or artefact? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 181-187.
20. TAKAMURA K. 1996: Changes in sex ratio of chironomid imagines from rice field waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 135: 413-421.
21. UNDERWOOD D.L.A. & SHAPIRO A.M. 1999: A male-biased primary sex ratio and larval mortality in Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Evol. Ecol. Res, 1: 703-717.
22. WEST S.A. & SHELDON B.C. 2002: Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295: 1685-1688.
23. WHITE G.C., ANDERSON D.R., BURNHAM K.P. & OTIS D.L. 1982: Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Los Alamos Nat. Lab., Los Alamos, New Mexico, pp. 98-146.
24. WITKOWSKI Z. & ADAMSKI P. 1996: Decline and rehabilitation of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius Apollo (Linnaeus 1758) in the Pieniny National Park. In Settele J., Margules C., Poschlod P. & Henle K. (eds): Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 7-14.