Advocacy in an era of neoconservatism: Responses of national aging organizations

Generations

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 49-54

  Binstock, Robert H ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042820682     PISSN: 07387806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Cook, D. 2003. "The Point Man on AARP'S Controversial Move." Christian Science Monitor. Dec. 11 (http://www.christiansciencemonitor.com/2003/ 12/11/p03s01-supo.hmtl, accessed Dec. 29, 2003).
2. Freudenheim, M. 2004. "Using New Medicare Billions, H.M.O.'s Again Court Elderly? New York Times, March 9, p. A1.
3. Holmes, S. A. 2001. "The World According to AARP." New fork Times, March 21, p. D1.
4. Iglehart, J. K. 2004. "The New Medicare Prescription-Drug-Benefit - a Pure Power Play?" New England Journal of Medicine, 350: 826-33.
5. Lehrman, E. I. 1995. "Health-Care Reform at the Crossroads." Modern Maturity (Jan.-Feb.): 12.
6. Morris, C. R. 1996. The AARP: America's Most Powerful Lobby and the Clash of Generations. New York: Times Books.
7. Pear, R. 2004. "AARP, Eye on Drug Costs, Urges Change in New Law." New York Times, Jan. 17, p. A12.
8. Pear, R., and Toner, R. 2003. "Counting Votes and Attacks in Final Push for Medicare Bill." New York Times, NOV. 20, p. A21.
9. Stolberg. S. G. 2003. "An 800-Pound Gorilla Changes Partners Over Medicare." New York Times, Nov. 23, p. wk5.