Lesson learned from attempts to implement daily build

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn 8, Issue , 2004, Pages 137-146

  Kajko Mattsson, Mira ^a   Jonson, Marcus ^a   Koroorian, Saam ^a   Westin, Fredrik ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Front End AB ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Automated tests; Concurrent engineering; Daily build engineer; Feature teams; Incremental software development; Regression tests; Smoke tests

Indexed keywords

BINARY CODES; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INSPECTION; PROGRAM COMPILERS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATED TESTS; DAILY BUILD ENGINEER; FEATURE TEAMS; INCREMENTAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; REGRESSION TESTS; SMOKE TESTS;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

EID: 3042812065     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Bereza-Jarocinski, B, Automated testing in daily build, Swedish Engineering Industries 2000.
2. Cusumano M, Selby R., How Microsoft builds software, Communications of ACM, Vol 40, Issue 6, June 1997, pp 53-61.
3. Dustin, E, Automated Software Testing, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
4. Ebert Ch, et.al., Improving Validation activities in a global software development, In Proceedings, IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001, pp. 545-554.
5. Karlsson E-A, Andersson L-G, Leion P., Daily build and feature development in large distributed projects, In Proceedings, 22nd IEEE International Conference on the Software Process, 2000, pp. 649 658.
6. Olsson, K, Karlsson, E-A, Daily build -the best of both worlds: rapid development and control, Swedish Engineering Industries, 1999.
7. Robbins, J, Debugging applications, Chapter 2, Microsoft Press 2000.
8. Swedish Engineering Industries, 12 Dec 2002, http://www.vi.se