The process of and the lessons learned from performance tuning of a product family software architecture for mobile phones

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn 8, Issue , 2004, Pages 270-275

  Del Rosso, Christian ^a  

^a NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

MOBILE PHONES; NOKIA (CO); PRODUCT FAMILY ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 3042812060     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. G. Abowd, L. Bass, L. Clements, R. Kazman, L. Northrop, and A. Zaremski. Recommended best industrial practice for software architecture evaluation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-TR-025, http://www.sei.cmu.edu, January 1997.
2. G. Booch. Conducting a software architecture assessment. Rational White Paper, http://www.rational.com/products/whitepapers/391.jsp.
3. J. Bosch. Design and Use of Sofware Architectures. Addison Wesley, 2000.
4. P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines. Addison Wesley, 2002.
5. A. Cockburn. Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, 2000.
6. M. Fowler. Refactoring, improving the Design of the existing code. Addison Wesley, 1999.
7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns. Addison Wesley, 1995.
8. R. L. Glass. Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering. Addison Wesley, 2003.
9. IEEE 2000. Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. IEEE Standard No. 1471-2000, http://shop.ieee.org/ store/.
10. M. Jazayeri, F. Van Der Linden, and A. Ran. Software Architecture for Product Families. Addison Wesley, 2000.
11. P. B. Kruchten. The 4+1 view model of software architecture. IEEE Software, Vol 12(issue 6), November 1995.
12. A. Maccari. Experiences in assessing product family architecture for evolution. Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), May 2002.
13. I. Pyarali, C. O'Ryan, D. C. Schmidt, N. Wang, V. Kachroo, and A. Gokhale. Using principle patterns to optimize real-time orbs. Concurrency, IEEE (see also IEEE Parallel & Distributed Technology), 8(1):16-25, Jan-March 2000.
14. C. Riva and C. Del Rosso. Experiences with software product family evolution. Proceedings of the sixth International workshop on principles of software evolution, (SE-5 2), 2003.
15. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. Performance Solutions. Addison Wesley, 1995.