Governance of collaborations: A case study

Administration in Social Work

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 7-28

  Ferguson, Charlie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study; Collaboration; Governance; Nonprofit management; Social services

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042811446     PISSN: 03643107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J147v28n02_02     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blank, M. J., & Lombardi, J. (1991). Towards improved services for children and families: Forging new relationships through collaboration. White Plains, NY: A.L. Mailman Family Foundation.
2. Bruner, C. (1991). Thinking collaboratively: Ten questions and answers to help policy makers improve children's services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium.
3. Center for the Study of Social Policy. (1994). Framework for improving outcomes for children and families. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Chaskin, R. J., & Richman, H. A. (1992). Concerns about school-linked services: Institutional-based versus community-based models. The Future of Children, 2(1), 107-117.
5. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94, 95-120,
6. Coordinated Youth Services Council of Marin. (1996). CYSC Goals and Objectives: Draft Copy. Marin County, CA: Author.
7. Coordinated Youth Services Council of Marin. (1996). Bylaws. Marin County, CA: Author.
8. Ellis, N., & Joslin, A. W. (1990). Shared governance and responsibility: The key to leadership, commitment, and vision in school reform. Wilmington, NC: University of North Carolina.
9. Gardner, S. L. (1992), Key issues in developing school-linked, integrated services. The Future of Children, 2(1), 84-94.
10. Gil de Gibaja, M. (2001). An exploratory study of administrative practice in collaboratives. Administration in Social Work, 25(2), 39-59.
11. Gillespie, D. M., & Nackerud, L. (2000). A case study of community collaboration: Georgia's experience with local governance and systems reform. Journal of Community Practice, 7(3), 1-20.
12. Kagan, S. L. (1993). Leadership training for collaboration. (Draft). Paper presented at the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory Regional Early Childhood Forum.
13. Langman, J., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1993). Collaborate or go it alone: Tough decisions for youth policy. In S. Brice Heath & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Identity and inner-city youth (pp. 147-175). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
14. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Lourie, I. S. (1994). Principles of local system development. Chicago: Kaleidoscope.
16. Melaville, A. I., & Blank, M. J. (1993). Together we can: A guide for crafting a profamily system of education and human services. Washington. DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
19. Schorr, L. B. (1988). Within our reach. New York: Anchor Books.
20. Stephens, S. A., Leiderman, S. A., Wolf, W. C., & McCarthy, P. T. (1994). Building capacity for system reform. Bala Cynwyd, PA: The Center for Assessment and Policy Development.
21. White, J. A., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard to do? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 23-38.
22. Wynn, J., Costello, J., Halpern, R., & Richman, H. (1994). Children, families, and communities: A new approach to social services. Chicago: University of Chicago, The Chapin Hall Center for Children.
23. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.