|
|
Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 675-676
|
|
The right place of 18FDG PET for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis - A response to the article of Brodmann et al. (multiple letters) [7]
a,b
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;
BLOOD VESSEL BIOPSY;
COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY;
GIANT CELL ARTERITIS;
HUMAN;
IMAGING SYSTEM;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
TEMPORAL ARTERITIS;
COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
NOTE;
SCINTISCANNING;
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18;
HUMANS;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;
TEMPORAL ARTERITIS;
TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;
|
|
EID: 3042810103
PISSN: 14620324
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh093 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
