Technical note: Analytical sensitivity coefficients for the GAML infiltration model

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 479-484

  Wilson, B N ^a   Oduro, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; Hydrologic models; Infiltration; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

INFILTRATION; MOISTURE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PONDING; SOILS; WATER QUALITY;

GREEN-AMPT-MEIN-LARSON MODEL; SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENTS;

AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING;

CALIBRATION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFILTRATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 3042805218     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baffaut, C., M. A. Nearing, J. C. Ascough, and B. Liu. 1997. The WEPP watershed model: II. Sensitivity analysis and discretization on small watersheds. Trans. ASAE 40(4): 935-943.
2. Bartell, S. M., J. E. Breck, J. E., R. H. Gardner, and A. L. Brenkert. 1986. Individual parameter perturbation and error analysis of fish bioenergetics models. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Science 43: 160-168.
3. Beck, J. V., and K. J. Arnold. 1977. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
4. Brooks, R. H., and A. T. Corey. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper No. 3. Fort Collins, Colo.: Colorado State University.
5. Chow, V. T., D. R. Maidment, and L. W. Mays. 1988. Applied Hydrology. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
6. Chu, S. T. 1978. Infiltration during an unsteady rain. Water Resources Research 14(3): 461-466.
7. Flanagan, D. C., and S. J. Livingston, eds. 1995. WEPP user summary. NSERL Report No. 11. West Lafayette, Ind.: National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory.
8. Garen, D. C., and S. J. Burges. 1981. Approximate error bounds for simulated hydrograph. J. Hydraulics Division, Proc. ASCE 107(HY11): 1519-1534.
9. Horwedel, J. E. 1991. GRESS: A preprocessor for sensitivity analysis of Fortran programs. In Proc. SIAM workshop: Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation, and Application, 243-250. Philadelphia, Pa.: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
10. Horwedel, J. E., S. F. Railsback, and H. I. Jager. 1991. Automated sensitivity analysis for Fortran models. In Proc. 18th Annual Conference and Symposium: Planning and Management and Urban Water Resources, 484-488. Reston, Va.: ASCE.
11. James, W. P., J. Warinner, and M. Reedy. 1992. Application of the Green-Ampt infiltration equation to watershed modeling. Water Resources Bulletin 28(3): 623-635.
12. King, K. W. 2000. Response of Green-Ampt-Mein-Larson simulated runoff volumes to temporally aggregated precipitation. J. American Water Resources Assoc. 36(4): 791-797.
13. King, K. W., J. G. Arnold, and R. L. Bingner. 1999. Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT. Trans. ASAE 42(4): 919-925.
14. Mein, R. G., and C. L. Larson. 1973. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resources Research 9(2): 384-394.
15. Moore, I. D., C. L. Larson, D. C. Slack, B. N. Wilson, F. Idike, and M. C. Hirschi. 1981. Modeling infiltration: A measurable parameter approach. J. Agric. Eng. Research 26(1): 21-32.
16. Oduro, P., and B. N. Wilson. 1997. An evaluation of the water erosion prediction project model. Presented at the 1997 ASAE Annual International Meeting. ASAE Paper 972231. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
17. Rawls, W J., L. R. Ahuja, and D. L. Brakensiek. 1992. Estimating soil hydraulic properties from soils data. In Proc. International Workshop on Indirect Methods for Estimating the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils, 329-340. van Genuchten, Leij, and Lund, eds. Riverside, Cal.: University of California.
18. Silburn, D. M., and R. J. Loch. 1989. Evaluation of the CREAMS model: I. Sensitivity analysis of the soil erosion/sedimentation component for aggregated clay soils. Australian J. Soil Research 27: 545-61.
19. Tiscareno-Lopez, M., V. L. Lopes, J. L. Stone, and L. J. Lane. 1993. Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP watershed model for rangeland applications: I. Hillslope processes. Trans. ASAE 36(6): 1659-1672.
20. Wilson, B. N. 2002. Good calibration and validation practices for hydrologic and water quality models. Presented at the 2002 Annual International Meeting. ASAE Paper No. 022294. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
21. Zhang, X. C., M. A. Nearing, L. M. Risse, and K. C. McGregor. 1996. Evaluation of WEPP runoff and soil loss predictions using natural runoff plot data. Trans. ASAE 39(3): 855-863.