Navigation using fluoro CT technology: Concept and clinical experience in a new method for intraoperative navigation

European Journal of Trauma

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 161-170

  Gruetzner, Paul Alfred ^a   Waelti, Heinz ^b   Vock, Bernd ^a   Hebecker, Axel ^c   Nolte, Lutz Peter ^b   Wentzensen, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 D C arm; Computer assisted surgery; Inherent registration; Intraoperative imaging; Navigation; Pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE CYST; BONE GRAFT; BONE SCREW; CANCELLOUS BONE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DEVICE FAILURE; DRILL; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FRACTURE EXTERNAL FIXATION; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTRAOPERATIVE NAVIGATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MOBILE C ARM; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TALUS; THREE DIMENSIONAL C ARM IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 3042805099     PISSN: 14390590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berlemann U, Monin D, Arm E, et al. Planning and Insertion of pedicle screws with computer assistance. J Spinal Disord 1997;10:117-24.
2. Gebhard F, Kinzl L, Arand M. Grenzen der CT-basierten Computernavigation in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 2000;103:696-701.
3. Grützner PA, Köhler T, Vock B, et al. Rechnergestütztes Operieren an der Wirbelsäule. OP Journal 2001;17:185-90.
4. Nolte LP, Zamorano LJ, Jiang Z, et al. Image-guided insertion of transpedicular screws. A laboratory set-up. Spine 1995;20:497-500.
5. Messmer P, Jacob AL, Fries E, et al. [Technology integration and process management. Concept and implementation of a new platform for simultaneous diagnosis and therapy of acutely ill and injured patients and for elective computer assisted surgery (CAS).] Unfallchirurg 2001;104:1025-30.
6. Messmer P, Baumann B, Suhm N, et al. [Navigation systems for image-guided therapy: a review.] Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001;173:777-84.
7. Grützner PA, Vock B, Wentzensen A. Use of computer assisted, fluoroscopy based navigation in treatment of pelvic ring disruptions. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al., eds. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000:965.
8. Grützner PA, Vock B, Wentzensen A. C-Arm-Navigation an der LWS. Osteologie 2001;10:Suppl 2:86.
9. Nolte LP, Slomczykowski MA, Berlemann U, et al. A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation. Eur Spine J 2000;9:Suppl 1:S78-88.
10. El Sheik M, Heverhagen JT, Alfke H, et al. Multiplanar reconstructions and three-dimensional imaging (computed rotational osteography) of complex fractures by using a C-arm system: initial results. Radiology 2001;221:843-9.
11. Euler E, Wirth S, Linsenmaier U, et al. Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Qualität C-Bogen-basierter 3D-Bildgebung am Talus. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:839-46.
12. Euler E, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, et al. 3D-Bildgebung mit einem mobilen isozentrischen C-Bogen. electromedica 2000;68:122-6.
13. Euler E, Heinig S, Fischer T, et al. Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit dem SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. electromedica 2002;70:64-7.
14. Kotsianos D, Rock C, Wirth S, et al. [Detection of tibial condylar fractures using 3D imaging with a mobile image amplifier (Siemens ISO-C-3D): comparison with plain films and spiral CT.] Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002;174:82-7.
15. Rock C, Linsenmaier U, Brandl R, et al. Vorstellung eines neuen mobilen C-Bogen-/CT-Kombinationsgerätes (ISO-C-3D): erste Ergebnisse der 3D-Schnittbildgebung. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:827-33.
16. Ritter D, Mitschke M, Graumann R. Markerlose Navigation mit der intraoperativen Bildgebungsmodalität SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. electromedica 2002;70:47-52.
17. Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2000;9:Suppl 1:S57-64.
18. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 1997;22:452-8.
19. Gertzbein S, Robbins S. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 1990;15:11-4.
20. Weinstein J, Spratt K, Sprengel D, et al. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram, based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 1988;13: 1012-8.
21. Arand M, Hartwig E, Hebold D, et al. [Precision analysis of navigation-assisted implanted thoracic and lumbar pedicled screws. A prospective clinical study.] Unfallchirurg 2001;104:1076-81.
22. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mätikalo K, et al. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. Spine 1997;11:1254-8.
23. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikosi M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9:235-40.
24. Suhm N, Jacob AL, Nolte LP, et al. Surgical navigation based on fluoroscopy - clinical application for computer-assisted distal locking of intramedullary implants. Comput Aided Surg 2000;5:391-400.