A survey of online instructional issues and strategies for postsecondary students with learning disabilities

Information Technology and Disabilities

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages

  Cook, Robin A ^a   Gladhart, Marsha A ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042803529     PISSN: 10735127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Adobe (2001). Adobe Acrobat 5.0 and Section 508. Retrieved August 27, 2001 from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/pdfs/Sect_5085.pdf.
2. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 42 U.S.C., 12101. (P.L. 101-336).
3. Blackboard, Inc. (2001, June). Blackboard Knowledge Base - Educational benefits of online learning. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from http://support.blackboard.com/bin/common/kb.pl.
4. Brown-Chidsey, R., & Boscardin, M.L. (1999). Computers as accessibility tools for students with and without learning disabilities. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 433671).
5. California Community Colleges (1999). Distance education: Access guidelines for students with disabilities. Sacramento, CA: High Tech Center Training Unit/Distance Education Accessibility Workgroup. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 438850).
6. Cast. (2000). Welcome to Bobby 3.2. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from http://www.cast.org/bobby/.
7. CEO Forum (2001, June). Year 4 StaR report: Key building blocks for student achievement in the 21st century. Retrieved August 29, 2001 from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/report4.pdf.
8. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S. & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.
9. Day, S.L., & Edwards, B.J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 486-492, 503.
10. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction. New York: Irvington.
11. FirstGov. (n.d.). 1998 Amendment to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Retrieved September 27, 2001, from http://www.section508.gov/508law.html.
12. FirstGov. (2000, July). Section 508: The road to accessibility. Last updated June 21, 2001. Retrieved September 27, 2001, from http://www.section508.gov/docs/508law.html.
13. Flottemesch, K.M. (2000). Interacting with students with disabilities: An examination of communication behaviors in distance learning environments. DAI, 61(03A), 819.
14. Gay, A.F. (1996). Facilitating alternative learning techniques for adults with learning disabilities through the use of technology. In N. Gregg, & C. Hoy, (Eds.) Adults with learning disabilities: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 368-392). New York: Guiford Press.
15. Green, K. (2000). The 2000 national survey of information technology in U.S. higher education. Retrieved September 10, 2001 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/.
16. Hallahan, D.P., & Kauffman, J.M. (2000). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education. (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Hanna, D.E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceocao-Runlee, S. (2000). 14 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of Web-based education. Madison, WI: Atwood.
18. Hasselbring, T.S., & Glaser, C.H.W. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102-122.
19. Hegarty, J., Bostock, S., & Collins, D. (2000). Staff development in information technology for special needs: A new, distance-learning course at Keele University. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 199-212.
20. Hinn, D.M. (1999, February). Evaluating the accessibility of Web-based instruction for students with disabilities. Published in the proceedings of the national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 436151).
21. Horn, L., Berktold, J., & Bobbitt, L. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics (U.S. Government Printing Office, NCES 1999-187).
22. Jay, C., & Blackerby, C.B. (1998). Hope is not a method: How instructional strategies and technologies for the learning disabled can benefit traditional learners. Houston, TX: North Harris Montgomery Community College District. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 416919).
23. Kaye, H.S. (2000). Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities. Disability Statistics Report, 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Retrieved August 27, 2001 from http://www.dsc.ucsf.edu/UCSF/.
24. Klemm, W.R. (1998, August). Eight ways to get students more engaged in online conferences. THE Journal (available online). Downloaded from the Blackboard Web page (http://support.blackboard.com). Last updated June 13, 2001.
25. Lewis, L., & Farris, E. (1999, August). An institutional perspective on students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (NCES 1999-046).
26. Lissner, L.S. (1995). Technological access and the law. Information Technology and Disabilities, 2(2), 1-7. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from http://www.isc.rit.edu/~easi/itd.html
27. Low, G. (2000). WebCT accessibility. Presentation on accessibility and WebCT, 2001 WebCT User Conference. Retrieved August 27, 2001 from http://www.webct.com/service/ViewContent?contentID=4899312.
28. McNulty, T. (1999). Accessible libraries on campus: A practical guide for the creation of disability-friendly libraries (p. 141-146). Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
29. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000, June). Stats in brief: Postsecondary students with disabilities: Enrollment, services, and persistence. Jessup, MD: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved August 21, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/200000092.pdf.
30. Olsen, F. (1999, October 29). Faculty wariness of technology remains a challenge, computing survey finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(10), p. A65.
31. Paciello, M. (2000). Web accessibility for people with disabilities. San Francisco: CMP Books.
32. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Perkins, B. (1995). Integrating hypermedia and assistive technology: An overview of possibilities. Information Technology and Disabilities, 2(1-4).
34. Queitzsch, M. (1997, March 3). Northwest regional profile: Integration of technology in preservice teacher education programs. Northwest Educational Technology Consortium. Retrieved September 7, 2001 from http://www.lnetc.org/prservice/challenge/html.
35. Rowland, C. (2000). Accessibility of the Internet in postsecondary education: Meeting the challenge. Retrieved August 20, 2001 from http://www.webaim.org/whitepaper.htm.
36. Schmetzke, A. (2001). Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools. Library Hi Tech, 19(1), 35-49.
37. Shiah, R.L. (1994). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematical problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. DAI, 55(08A), 2347.
38. Schmetzke, A. (2001). Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools. Library Hi Tech, 19(1), 35-49.
39. Uhran, J.J. (Jr.), Beery, P. & Wilkerson M. (1998, June). The Internet and its importance for those with disabilities: An example. Published in the proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications.
40. U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. (2000). Guide to the Section 508 standards for electronic and information technology. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/index.htm.
41. U.S. Department of Justice. (2001, September 20). Americans with Disabilities Act. Retrieved September 27, 2001 from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm.
42. U.S. Department of Labor. (1999). Futurework: Trends and challenges for work in the 21st century. Retrieved September 17, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dol.gov/asp/public/futurework/report.htm.
43. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Retrieved August 30, 2001 from http://www.dol.gov.
44. Web-based Education Commission. (2000, December). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Retrieved August 29, 2001 from http://www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/WBECReport.pdf.
45. WebAIM. (2001, March). Section 508 Web accessibility checklist. Latest update March 29, 2001. Retrieved August 20, 2001 from http://www.webaim.org/standards/508/checklist.
46. White, K.W., & Weight, B.H. (2000). The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies, and techniques for the virtual classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
47. Wissick, C.A., & Gardner, J.E. (2000). Multimedia or not to multimedia? Teaching Exceptional Children, 32 (4), 34-43.
48. Zhao, Y., Englert, C.S., Chen, J., Jones, S.C., & Ferdig, R.E. (2000). The development of a Web-based literacy learning environment: A dialogue between innovation and established practices. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 435-454.