Randomization methods in clinical trials;Métodos de aleatorização em ensaios clínicos

Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 741-755

  Vaz, Domingos ^a   Santos, Laura ^a   Machado, Micaela ^a   Vaz Carneiro, António ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA MOLECULAR   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Evidence based cardiology; Randomization; Randomized conntrolled trials

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 3042801170     PISSN: 08702551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Carneiro AV. Glossário de termos e conceitos utilizados pela cardiologia baseada na evidência científica. Parte II: Ensaios clínicos. Rev Port Cardiol 2001;20:203-10.
2. Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise? BMJ 1999;318:1209.
3. Ioannidis JPA, Haidich A, Pappa M, et al. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA 2001;286:821-9.
4. Ioannidis JPA, Haidich A, Lau J. Any casualties in the clash of randomised and observational evidence? BMJ 2001;322:879-80.
5. McKee M, Britton A, Black N, et al. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies. BMJ 1999;319:312-5.
6. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer, 1998
7. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T, for the CONSORT Group. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Int Med 2001;134:663-94.
8. Soares I, Carneiro AV. Princípios de análise metodológica de ensaios terapêuticos. Parte I - Validade dos resultados. Rev Port Cardiol 2002;21:457-69.
9. Guyatt GH, Rennie D, editors. User's Guides to the Medical Literature. A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Chicago: JAMA & Archives Journals AMA, 2001
10. Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998;317:1185-90.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. How to randomise. BMJ 1999; 319:703-4.
12. Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study Research Group. A randomized controlled trial of aspirin in persons recovered from myocardial infarction. JAMA 1980;243:661-9.
13. Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Factors influencing long-term prognosis after recovery from myocardial infarction - three-year findings of the Coronary Drug Project. J Chronic Dis 1974;27:267-85.
14. Efron B. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 1971;58:403-17.
15. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86.