Size and shape description of commercially available polyethylene particles for in vitro and in vivo experiments;Größe und form kommerziell erhältlicher polyethylenpartikel für in-vitro- und in-vivo-versuche

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 366-370

  Von Knoch, M ^a,b   Sprecher, C ^c   Barden, B ^a   Saxler, C ^a   Loer F ^a   Wimmer, M ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^d RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Morphologic analysis; Osteolysis; Particles; Polyethylene; Size analysis

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE; BIOMATERIAL; MICROSPHERE;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSPHERES; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYETHYLENE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 3042796059     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-822589     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Santavirta S et al. Studies of host response to orthopedic implants and biomaterials. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1999; 9: 67-76
2. Böhler M, Plenk H Jr, Salzer M. Alumina ceramic bearings for hip endoprostheses: the Austrian experiences. Clin Orthop 2000; 379: 85-93
3. Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop 1990; 258: 95-107
4. Bos I, Lindner B, Seydel U, Johannisson R, Dorre E, Henssge J, Lohrs U. The cause of loosening in cemented hip joint prostheses. Light and electron microscopy study and laser microprobe mass analysis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1990; 128: 73-82
5. Bos I, Meeuwssen E, Henssge EJ, Lohrs U. Differences in polyethylene wear in hip joint prostheses with ceramic- and with metal-polyethylene combination of the articulation surfaces - a study of surgical and of autopsy materials. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1991; 129: 507-515
6. Bos I, Berner J, Diebold J, Lohrs U. Histological and morphometric studies of femurs with stable hip joint replacement. An autopsy study with special reference to factors leading to late loosening. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1995; 133: 460-466
7. von Knoch M, Plotz G, Prymka M, Fortsch M, von Knoch F. Polyethylene content and cell size of foreign body giant cells in aseptic hip prosthesis loosening - a histomorphometric study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138: 522-525
8. Wilke A, Endres S, Griss P, Herz U. Cytokine profile of a human bone marrow cell culture on exposure to titanium-aluminium-vanadium particles. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 83-89
9. Schwarz EM, Lu AP, Goater JJ, Benz EB, Kollias G, Rosier RN, Puzas JE, O'Keefe RJ. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha/nuclear transcription factor-kappaB signaling in periprosthetic osteolysis. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 472-480
10. Plenk H Jr. Prosthesis-bone interface. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 43: 350-355
11. Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Macrophage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface area. J Biomed Mat Res 1994; 28: 81-90
12. Ingham E, Fisher J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H. J Eng Med 2000; 214: 21-37
13. Jacobs JJ, Shanbhag AS, Giant TT, Black J, Galante JO. Wear Debris in Total Joint Replacements. J Am Acad Orth Surg 1994; 2: 212-220
14. Barden B, Ding Y, Saxler G, Loer F. Response of human macrophages to challenge with polyethylene wear debris harvested during revision arthroplasty. Annual Meeting European Orthopaedic Research Society EORS, Lausanne, Switzerland 2002
15. Pienkowski D, Nassutt R, Lampe F, Schneider E, Morlock MM. A new screening method designed for wear analysis of bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty In: Jacobs J, Cendrowska T, Speiser P (eds). Alternative bearing surfaces in total joint replacement. ASTM STP 1346. American Society for Testing Materials 1998; 30-43
16. Lohmann CH, Schwartz Z, Koster G, Jahn U, Buchhorn GH, MacDougall MJ, Casasola D, Liu Y, Sylvia VL, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Phagocytosis of wear debris by osteoblasts affects differenziation and local factor production in a manner dependent on particle composition. Biomat 2000; 21: 551-561
17. Wimmer MA, Nassutt R, Lampe F, Schneider E, Morlock MM. A new screening method designed for wear analysis of bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty. In: Jacobs J, Cendrowska T, Speiser P (eds). Alternative Bearing Surfaces in Total Joint Replacement. ASTM STP 1346. American Society for Testing Materials 1998; 30-43
18. 3-PTFE materials. Wear 2001; 250: 159-166
19. Sprecher C, Wimmer MA. Size independent morphological description of polyethylene particles. J Biomech 2001; 34: 71
20. Sprecher C, Schneider E, Wimmer MA. Generalized size and shape description of UHMWPE wear debris - A Comparison of Cross-linked, Enhanced Fused, and Standard Polyethylene Particles. In: Kurtz SM, Gsell R, Martell J (eds). Crosslinked and Thermally Treated Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Joint Replacements. ASTM STP 1445. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2003
21. Clarke IC, Gustafson A, Jung H, Fujisawa A. Hip simulator ranking of polyethylene wear. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67: 128-132
22. Kaddick C, Wimmer MA. Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 2001; 215: 429-442
23. Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Giant TT, Gilbert JL, Black J, Galante JO. Composition and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994; 76: 60-66
24. Campbell P, Ma S, Yeom B, McKellop H, Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC. Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 127-131
25. Benz EB, Federman M, Godleski JJ, Bierbaum BE, Thornhill TS, Spector M. Transmission electron microscopy of intracellular particles of polyethylene from joint replacement prostheses: size distribution and cellular response. Biomat 2001; 22: 2835-2842
26. von Knoch M, Buchhorn G, von Knoch F, Koster G, Willert HG. Intracellular measurement of polyethylene particles. A histomorphometric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 399-402
27. th Orthopaedic Research Society, Transactions, San Francisco, California, 2001; 26: 0002
28. th Orthopaedic Research Society, Transactions, San Francisco, California, 2001; 26: 0001
29. Endo M, Tipper JL, Barton DC, Stone MH, Ingham E, Fisher J. Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2002; 216: 111-122
30. Green TR, Fisher J, Matthews JB, Stone MH, Ingham E. Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 490-497
31. von Knoch M, Jewison DE, Sibonga JD, Sprecher C, Morrey BF, Löer F, Berry DJ, Scully SP. The effectiveness of commercially available polyethylene versus titanium particles in inducing osteolysis in murine calvaria. J Orthop Res 2004; 22(2): 237-243