Merging the IRS LISS III and PAN data - Evaluation of various methods for a predominantly agricultural area

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 25, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 2657-2664

  Ray, S S ^a  

^a INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; DATA ACQUISITION; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; SATELLITES; SCANNING; SENSORS;

HIGH PASS FILTER; PRINCIPLE COMPONENT SUBSTITUTION;

REMOTE SENSING;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND USE; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; PUNJAB [INDIA]; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 3042784671     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160410001665821     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. CHAVEZ, P. S. JR, SIDES, C. S., and ANDERSON, J. A., 1991, Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57, 295-303.
2. KALYANARAMAN, S., RAJANGAM, R. K., and RATTAN, R., 1995, Indian Remote Sensing Spacecraft-1C/1D. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 791-799.
3. KUMAR, A. S., KARTIKEYAN, B., and MAJUMDER, K. L., 2000, Band sharpening of IRS multispectral imagery by cubic spline wavelets. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 581-594.
4. MALLAT, S. G., 1989, A theory of multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 674-693.
5. POHL, C., and VAN GENDEREN, J. L., 1998, Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 823-854.
6. RANCHIN, T., and WALD, L., 2000, Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images: the ARSIS concept and its implementation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, 49-61.
7. RAPTIS, V. S., VAUGHAN, R. A., HATZOPOLOUS, I. N., and PAPAPANAGIOTOU, V., 1998, The use of data fusion for the classification of dense urban environments, the Mytilene case. In Future Trends in Remote Sensing, edited by P. Gudmandsen (Rotterdam: Balkema), pp. 427-433.
8. TERRETTAZ, P., 1998, Comparison of different methods to merge SPOT P and XS data: evaluation in an urban area. In Future Trends in Remote Sensing, edited by P. Gudmandsen (Rotterdam: Balkema), pp. 435-443.
9. WALD, L., RANCHIN, T., and MANGOLINI, M., 1997, Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: assessing the quality of resulting images. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 691-699.
10. WELCH, R., and EHLERS, W., 1987, Merging multiresolution SPOT HRV and Landsat TM data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53, 301-303.
11. ZHANG, Y., 1999, A new merging method and its spectral and spatial effects. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 2003-2014.