|
Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1971-1973
|
Erratum: Why are general surgeons being excluded? (Surgical of Endoscopy (2003) 17 (1971-1973) DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8806-5);Why are general surgeons being excluded?
a,b a a,c a a |
Author keywords
Colonoscopy; Endoscopy; General Surgeons
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CECUM;
CHI SQUARE TEST;
COLITIS;
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL SURGERY;
DATA BASE;
DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION;
ENDOSCOPY;
GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE;
GENERAL SURGERY;
HUMAN;
INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION;
INTESTINE PERFORATION;
INTESTINE PREPARATION;
INTESTINE TUMOR;
KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MORBIDITY;
POSTPOLYPECTOMY SYNDROME;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
SURGEON;
SYNDROME;
CECOSTOMY;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FACTUAL DATABASE;
GASTROENTEROLOGY;
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT;
MEDICINE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
STATISTICS;
SURGERY;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
CECOSTOMY;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COLONOSCOPY;
DATABASES, FACTUAL;
GASTROENTEROLOGY;
HUMANS;
INTESTINAL PERFORATION;
MEDICAL STAFF PRIVILEGES;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL;
SURGERY;
|
EID: 3042779651
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: 14322218
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-0057-6 Document Type: Erratum |
Times cited : (24)
|
References (6)
|