District effectiveness: A study of investment strategies in New York city public schools and districts

Educational Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 491-512

  Iatarola, Patrice ^a   Fruchter, Norm ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

District effectiveness; Urban districts; Urban schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042777377     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904804265020     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution.
2. Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 99-127). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997a). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District 32, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
4. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997b). School variation and systemic instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. Pittsburgh, PA: High Performance Learning Communities Project, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
5. Goertz, M. E., Duffy, M. C., & LeFloch, K. C. (2001). Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 states: 1999-2000. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education.
6. Hallett, A. (Ed.). ( 1995). Reinventing central office: A primer for successful schools. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.
7. Hightower, A. M., Knapp, M. S., Marsh, J. A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (2002). School districts and instructional renewal. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Iatarola, P., Stiefel, L., & Schwanz, A. E. (2002). School performance and resource use: The role of districts in New York City. In C. Roellke & J. K. Rice (Eds.), Fiscal issues in urban education (pp. 93-116). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
9. Malen, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Kranz, J. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature - A call for research. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (Vol. 2, pp. 289-342). New York: Falmer.
10. Resnick, L. B., & Glennan, J., Jr. (2002). Leadership for learning: A theory of action for urban school districts. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 160-172). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Siegel, D., & Fruchter, N. (2001). Final report on the evaluation of the New York City Board of Education's performance driven budgeting initiative. New York: Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University, Steinhardt School of Education.
12. Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: MDRC.
13. Stone, C., Jones, B.D., Henig, J. R., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001 ). Building civic capacity: The politics of urban school reform. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.