Entanglement echoes in quantum computation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 5 A, 2004, Pages

  Rossini, Davide ^a   Benenti, Giuliano ^a,b   Casati, Giulio ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b INFM   (Italy)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CHAOS THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HAMILTONIANS; ITERATIVE METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE SHIFT; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; VECTORS;

QUANTUM CHAOTIC DYNAMICS; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUBITS; VON NEUMANN ENTROPY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 3042776202     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052317     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Previous investigations were mainly focused on the analysis of the fidelity of quantum computation [see, e.g., C. Miquel, J. P. Paz, and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3971 (1997) and Ref. [2]].
2. G. Benenti, G. Casati, S. Montangero, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 227901 (2001).
3. A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
4. C. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
5. R. Jozsa and N. Linden, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 459, 2011 (2003).
6. H. M. Pastawski, P. R. Levstein, and G. Usaj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4310 (1995); P. R. Levstein, G. Usaj, and H. M. Pastawski, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2718 (1998).
7. H. M. Pastawski, P. R. Levstein, and G. Usaj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4310 (1995); P. R. Levstein, G. Usaj, and H. M. Pastawski, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2718 (1998).
8. G. Benenti, G. Casati, S. Montangero, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. A 67, 052312 (2003).
9. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
10. We note that the evolution of entanglement in quantum algorithms simulating quantum chaos has been recently investigated by S. Bettelli and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. A 67, 054303 (2003); and by A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A 36, 9553 (2003).
11. We note that the evolution of entanglement in quantum algorithms simulating quantum chaos has been recently investigated by S. Bettelli and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. A 67, 054303 (2003); and by A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, J. Phys. A 36, 9553 (2003).
12. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993); S. K. Foong and S. Kanno, ibid. 72, 1148 (1993); S. Sen, ibid. 77, 1 (1996).
13. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993); S. K. Foong and S. Kanno, ibid. 72, 1148 (1993); S. Sen, ibid. 77, 1 (1996).
14. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993); S. K. Foong and S. Kanno, ibid. 72, 1148 (1993); S. Sen, ibid. 77, 1 (1996).
15. J. N. Bandyopadhyay and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 060402 (2002).
16. G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, I. Guarneri, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2437 (1986).
17. 12 enters this volume in a finite time.
18. The value of the constant R that appears in Eq. (5) can be determined from our numerical data for the fidelity decay, the entanglement echo decay (Fig. 4), and the relaxation to equi-librium (inset of Fig. 4). We get R ≈ 0.28, 0.26, and 0.39, respectively. The rather good agreement between these values is a further confirmation of the validity of our theoretical analysis.
19. P. Horodecki and A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 127902 (2002).
20. Y. S. Weinstein, S. Lloyd, J. Emerson, and D. G. Cory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 157902 (2002).
21. L.M.K. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. S. Yannoni, M. H. Sherwood, and I. L. Chuang, Nature (London) 414, 883 (2001).
22. S. Guide, M. Riebe, G.P.T. Lancaster, C. Becher, J. Eschner, H. Häffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, I. L. Chuang, and R. Blatt, Nature (London) 421, 48 (2003).