Comparison between arthroscopy and 3 dimensional double echo steady state (3D-DESS) sequences in magnetic resonance imaging of internal derangements of the knee

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 761-765

  Dongola, Nagwa A ^a   Gishen, Philip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KHARTOUM   (Sudan)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEADY STATE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE INJURIES; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3042775142     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kean DM, Worthington BS, Preston BJ, Roebuck EJ, McKim-Thomas H, Hawkes RC et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: examples of normal anatomy and pathology. Br J Radiol 1983; 56: 355-364.
2. Deutsch AL, Mink JH, Fox JM, Friedman MJ, Howell SM. The postoperative knee. Magn Reson Q 1992; 8: 23-54.
3. Crotty JM, Monu JU, Pope TL Jr. Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Part 4. The knee. Clin Orthop 1996; 330: 288-303.
4. Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Bungay H, Hatrick C, Salas C, Parry D et al. The cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for investigation of the knee joint. Health Technol Assess 2001: 5: 91-95.
5. Gluckert K, Kladny B, Blank-Schal A, Hofmann G. MRI of the knee joint with a 3-D gradient echo sequence. Equivalent to diagnostic arthroscopy? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1992; 112: 5-14.
6. Reeder JD, Matz SO, Becker L, Andelman SM. MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 537-540.
7. Barnett MJ. MR diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee: effect of field strength on efficacy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 115-118.
8. Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D, Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 329-335.
9. Ruehm S, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. MRI of patellar articular cartilage: evaluation of an optimized gradient echo sequence (3D-DESS). J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1246-1251.
10. Kreitner KF, Hansen M, Schadmand-Fischer S, Krummenauer F, Runkel M. Low-field MRI of the knee joint: results of a prospective, arthroscopically controlled study]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999; 170: 35-40.
11. Woertler K, Strothmann M, Tombach B, Reimer P. Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 678-685.
12. Mackenzie R, Keene GS, Lomas DJ, Dixon AK. Errors at knee magnetic resonance imaging: true or false? Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 1045-1051.
13. Reeder JD, Matz SO, Becker L, Andelman SM. MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 537-540.
14. Kelly MA, Flock TJ, Kimmel JA, Kiernan HA Jr, Singson RS, Starron RB et al. MR imaging of the knee: clarification of its role. Arthroscopy 1991; 7: 78-85.
15. Boeve BF, Davidson RA, Staab EV Jr. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of knee injuries. South Med J 1991; 84: 1123-1127.
16. Ireand J, Tricky EL, Stocker DJ. Arthroscopy and arthrography of the knee: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 3-6.
17. Selesnick FH, Noble HB, Bachman DC, Steinberg FL. Internal derangement of the knee: diagnosis by arthrography, arthroscopy and arthrotomy. Clin Orthop 1985: 196: 26-30.
18. Quinn SF, Brown TF. Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging versus arthroscopy: how reliable a standard is arthroscopy? Radiology 1991; 181: 843-847.
19. Mink JH, Levy T, Crues JV 3rd. Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1988; 167: 769-774.
20. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV 3rd, Kaplan L, Mink JH. Meniscal tears: Pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 163: 731-735.
21. Rubin DA, Kettering JM, Towers JD, Britton CA. MR imaging of knees having isolated and combined ligament injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1207-1213.
22. Heron CW, Calvert PT. Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. Radiology 1992; 183: 839-844.
23. Tyrrell RL, Gluckert K, Pathria M, Modic MT. Fast three-dimensional MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy. Radiology 1988; 166: 865-872.
24. Hayes CW, Sawyer RW, Conway WF. Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1990; 176: 479-483.