Review of non-independence, asymmetry, skew-symmetry and point-symmetry models in the analysis of social mobility data

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-289

  Lawal, H Bayo ^a  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Generalized symmetry; Odds symmetry; Over stayer; Poisson

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042775026     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:QUQU.0000031321.45728.1f     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Agresti, A. (1983). A simple diagonals-parameter symmetry and quasi-symmetry model. Statist. Prob. Letters 1: 313-316.
2. Bishop, Y.M., Fienberg, S. & Holland, P.W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis. MIT Press.
3. Agresti, A. (1988). A model for agreement between ratings on an ordinal scale. Biometrics 44: 539-548
4. Agresti, A. (1989a). Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Agresti, A. (1989b). A survey of models for repeated ordered categorical response data. Statist. Medicine 8: 1209-1224.
6. Agresti, A. (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. Becker, M. P. (1990). Quasi symmetry models for the analysis of contingency tables. J. Royal Statist. Soc., B 52: 369-378.
8. Caussinus, H. (1965). Contributions a l'analyse statistique des tableaux de correlation. Ann. Fac. Sci. Univ. Toulouse 29: 77-182.
9. Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In: G. Armiger, C. C. Clogg & M. E. Sobel (eds), Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 311-359.
10. Clogg, C. C., Eliason, S. R. & Grego, J. M. (1990). Models for the analysis of change in discrete variables. In: A. Von Eye (ed.), Statistical Methods in Longitudinal Research, Vol 2, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 409-441.
11. Duncan, O. D. (1979). How destination depends on origin in the occupational mobility table. American Journal of Sociology 84: 793-803.
12. von Eye, A. & Spiel, C. (1996). Standard and non-standard log-linear symmetry models for measuring change in categorical variables. American Statistician 50: 300-305.
13. Haberman, S. (1978). Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press. Inc.
14. Featherman, D. L. & Hauser, R. M. (1978). Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
15. Firth D. & Treat, B. R. (1988). Square contingency tables and GLIM. GLIM Newletter 16: 16-20.
16. Friedl, H. (1995). A note on generating the factors for symmetry parameters in log-linear models. GLIM Newletter 24: 33-36.
17. Hope, K. (1981). The new mobility Ratio. Social Forces 60: 545-556.
18. Hope K. (1982). Vertical and non vertical class mobility in three countries. American Sociological Review 47: 99-113.
19. Goodman, L. A. (1972). Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross-classified data. In: Le Carm et al., Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 649-695. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Goodman, L. A. (1979a). Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of cross-classification. Amer. Jour. Sociology 84: 804-819.
21. Goodman, L. A. (1979b). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74: 537-552.
22. Goodman, L. A. (1979c). Multiplicative models for square contingency tables with ordered categories. Biometrika 66: 413-418.
23. Goodman, L. A. (1984). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. The Annals of Statistics 13: 10-69.
25. Goodman, L. A. (1986). Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables with discussion. International Statistical Review 54: 243-270.
26. Goodman, L. A. (1991). Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86: 1085-1111.
27. Hutchinson, B. (1958). Structural and Exchange mobility in the assimilation of immigrants to Brazil. Population Studies 12: 111-120.
28. Katari, M. (1993). Fitting asymmetry and non-independence models with GLIM. GLIM Newsletter 22: 46-50.
29. Knoke, D. & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-Linear Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
30. Kutylowski, A. J. (1989). Analysis of symmetric cross-classifications. In Lecture Notes in Statistics 57: 188-197.
31. Lawal, H. B. (1992). Parsimonious uniform-distance association models for the occupational mobility data. J. Japan Statist. Soc. 22: 183-192.
32. Lawal, H. B. (1993). Association, symmetry and diagonal models for occupational mobility and other similar square contingency tables having ordered categorical variables. Biometrical Journal 35: 193-206.
33. Lawal, H.B. (2001). Modeling symmetry models in square contingency tables with ordered categories. To appear Jour. Comput. Statist. and Simul.
34. Lawal, H. B. (2002). Decomposing the symmetry model in square contingency tables Having ordered categories using the GLM approach. Submitted Communications in Statistics.
35. Lawal, H. B. (2003). Point-symmetry models in square contingency tables having ordered categories. Submitted.
36. Lawal, H. B. & Sundheim, R. (2002). Generating factor variables for asymmetry, non-independence and skew-symmetry models in square contingency tables using SAS. Submitted.
37. Lawal, H. B. & Upton, G. J. G. (1990). Alternative interaction structures in square contingency tables having ordered classificatory variables. J. Quality and Quantity 24: 107-127.
38. Macdonald, K. I. (1981). On the formulation of a structured model of the mobility table. Social Forces 60: 557-571.
39. McCullagh, P. (1978). A class of parametric models for the analysis of square contingency tables with ordered categories. Biometrika 65: 413-418.
40. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.
41. Sobel, M. E., Hout, M., and Duncan, O. D. (1985). Exchange, structure and symmetry in occupational mobility. Amer. Jour. Sociol. 91: 359-372.
42. Sobel, M. E. (1995). The analysis of contingency tables. In: G. Armiger, C. C. Clogg & M. E. Sobel (eds), Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. pp. 251-310.
43. 3 contingency tables with ordered categories. J. Japan Statist. Soc. 13: 127-135.
44. Tomizawa, S. (1984). Three kinds of decomposition for the conditional symmetry model in a square contingency table. J. Japan Statist. Soc. 14: 413-418.
45. Tomizawa, S. (1985a). The decompositions for point-symmetry model in two-way contingency tables. Biom. J. 8: 895-905.
46. Tomizawa, S. (1985b). Analysis of data in square contingency tables with ordered categories using the conditional symmetry and its decomposed models. Environmental Health Perspectives. 63: 235-239.
47. Tomizawa, S. (1986a). A decomposition for the inclined point-symmetry model in a square contingency table. Biom. J. 3: 371-380.
48. Tomizawa, S. (1986b). Four kinds of symmetry models and their decompositions in a square contingency table with ordered categories. Biometrical Journal 28: 387-393.
49. Tomizawa, S. (1987). Decomposition for 2-Ratios-Parameter symmetry model in square contingency tables with ordered categories. Biom. J. 1: 45-55.
50. Tomizawa, S. (1992). Quasi-diagonals-parameter symmetry model for square contingency tables with ordered categories. Calcutta Statist. Assoc. Bull. 39: 53-61.
51. Upton, G. J. G. (1985). A survey of log linear models for ordinal variables in an I × J contingency table. Guru Nanak Jour. Sociology 6: 1-18.
52. Upton, G. J. G. & Sarvik, B. (1981). A loyalty-distance model for voting change. Jour. Royal Statist. Soc. bf A, 144: 247-259.
53. Wall, K. D. and Lienert, G. A. (1976). A test for point-symmetry in J-dimensional contingency cubes. Biom. Z. 18: 259-264.
54. Yamagushi, K. (1990). Some models for the analysis of asymmetric association in square contingency tables with ordered categories. In: C. C. Clogg (ed.), Sociological Methodology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 181-212.