Building theoretical underpinnings for digital forensics research

Digital Investigation

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 61-68

  Mocas, Sarah ^a  

^a Portland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital forensic; Electronic evidence; Theoretical framework

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; HARD DISK STORAGE; NONBIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; PUBLIC POLICY; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH; SECURITY OF DATA; SERVERS;

DIGITAL FORENSICS; ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE; FORENSIC TOOLS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES;

EID: 3042774608     PISSN: 17422876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2003.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Carrier B. Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools using abstraction layers. Int J Digit Evid. 1:(4):2003.
2. Casey E. Error, uncertainty and loss in digital evidence. Int J Digit Evid. 1:(2):2002.
3. De Vel Olivier, Corney Malcolm, Anderson Alison, Mohay George. Language and gender analysis of e-mail authorship for computer forensics. In: Proceedings of Second Digital Forensic Research Workshop 2002; 2002.
4. Duren, Hosmer C. Can digital evidence endure the test of time? In: Proceedings of the Second Digital Forensic Research Workshop 2002; 2002.
5. Giordano J., Maciag C. Cyber forensics: a military operations perspective. Int J Digit Evid. 1:(2):2002.
6. Institute for Security Technology Study. Law enforcement tools and technologies for investigating cyber attacks: a national needs assessment. 2002;ISTS, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
7. International Organization on Computer Evidence. International principles for computer evidence. Forensic Sci Commun. 2:(2):April 2000.
8. Landwehr C.E. Computer security. Int J Inf Secur. 1:2001;3-13.
9. Lyle James. NIST CFTT: testing disk imaging tools. In: Proceedings of Second Digital Forensic Research Workshop 2002; 2002.
10. Mayfield T, Roskos JE, Welkeand SR, Boone JM. Integrity in automated information systems. Technical Report 79-91, National Computer Security Center (NCSC), Institute for Defense Analyses, 1801 N. Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311; September 1991.
11. National Center for Forensic Science. Digital evidence in the courtroom: a guide for preparing digital evidence for courtroom presentation. 2003;US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. Draft document at http://www.ncfs.org/DE_courtroomdraft.pdf.
12. National Institute of Justice. Crime scene investigation: a guide for law enforcement. 2000;US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. [NCJ 178280].
13. National Institute of Justice. Electronic crime scene investigation: a guide for law enforcement. 2000;US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. [NCJ 187736].
14. Noblett Michael G., Pollitt Mark M., Presley Lawrence A. Recovering and examining computer forensic evidence. Forensic Sci Commun. 2:(4):October 2000.
15. Palmer G. A road map for digital forensics research. Report from the First Digital Forensics Research Workshop (DFRWS). Technical Report DTR-T001-01, Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome Research Site; 2001.
16. Reith M., Carr C., Gunsch G. An examination of digital forensic models. Int J Digit Evid. 1:(3):2002.
17. Salgado Richard. The legal ramifications of operating a honeypot. IEEE Secur Privacy. 1:(2):2003;18-19.
18. Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence. Proposed standards for the exchange of digital evidence. Forensic Sci Commun. 2:(2):April 2000.
19. US Department of Justice. Searching and seizing computers and related electronic evidence issues. 2002;Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/searching.htm.