Ethical dilemmas of extreme prematurity;Les enjeux éthiques de l'extrême prématurité

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 33, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Dehan, M ^a   Zupan Simunek, V ^a   Vial, M ^a  

^a HÔPITAL ANTOINE BÉCLÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

Ethics; Extreme prematurity; Fetus; Infant; Newborn

Indexed keywords

BIRTH WEIGHT; BRAIN INJURY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREMATURITY; DECISION MAKING; PARENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, MEDICAL; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; PARENTS;

EID: 3042769710     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Chan K, Ohlsson A, Synnes A, Lee DS, Chien LY, Lee SK et al. Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks' gestational age or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001: 185: 220-6.
2. Comité consultatif national d'éthique pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé. Rapport n° 65: Réflexions éthiques autour de la réanimation néonatale. In: Les cahiers du C.C.N.E. 2001; 26: 3-17 et site internet: www.ccne-ethique.org
3. Dehan M. Libres propos sur le rapport n° 65 du CCNE. In: Les cahiers du CCNE 2001; 26: 19-24.
4. Royal college of paediatrics and child health. Withholding or withdrawing. Life saving treatment in children. A framework for practice. Londres, septembre 1997.
5. es Journées nationales de néonatologie. SFN éd. Paris, 2000: 243-65.
6. de Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, Berbik I, Hansen G, Kucinskas A et al. Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 608-16.
7. Dehan M, Gold F, Grassin M, Janaud JC, Morisot C, Ropert JC et al. Dilemmes éthiques de la période périnatale: recommandations pour les décisions de fin de vie. Arch Pediatr 2001; 8: 407-19.
8. Mac Donald H and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 1024-27.
9. Fetus and Newborn Committee. Canadian Pediatric Society and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 151: 547-53.
10. Berger TM et le Groupe de travail de la Société Suisse de Néonatologie. Recommandations pour la prise en charge des prématurés à la limite de la viabilité (22-26 semaines de gestation). In: Bulletin des médecins suisses. Editores Medicorum Helveticorum 2002; 83: 1596-602.
11. Tyson JE, Stoll BJ. Evidence-based ethics and the care and outcome of extremely premature infants. Clin Perinatol 2003; 30: 363-87.
12. Morse SB, Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL, Bronstein J, Nelson KG, Carlo WA. Estimation of neonatal outcome and perinatal therapy use. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1046-50.
13. Streiner DL, Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf B, Rosenbaum P. Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 152-7.
14. Zupancic JA, Kirpalani H, Barrett J, Stewart S, Gafni A, Streiner D et al. Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 87: F113-7.
15. Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL, Streiner D. Impact of extreme prematurity on families of adolescent children. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 701-6.
16. Iams JD, Mercer BM for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. What we have learned about antenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27: 247-52.