Combining Bayesian and simulation approaches to compare the efficiency of two types of tags used in tropical tuna fisheries

Aquatic Living Resources

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 175-183

  Gaertner, Daniel ^a   Hallier, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Likelihood analysis; Return rate; Tagging data; Tuna fisheries

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; TAGGING; TUNA FISHERY;

SCOMBRIDAE GEN. SP.; THUNNUS OBESUS;

EID: 3042768123     PISSN: 09907440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/alr:2004016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agresti A., 1990, Categorical data analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.
2. Bayliff W., Holland K., 1986, Materials and methods for tagging tuna and billfishes, recovering the tags and handling the recapture data. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 279.
3. Berger J.O., Berry D.A., 1988, Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. Am. Scient. 76, 159-165.
4. Bernier J., Parent E., Boreux J.-J., 2000, Statistique pour l'environnement. Traitement bayésien de l'incertitude. Ed. Tec & Doc., Paris.
5. Chen Y., Breen P.A., Andrew N.L., 2000, Impacts of outliers and misspecification of priors on Bayesian fisheries-stock assessment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 2293-2305.
6. Fonteneau A., Diouf T., 1994, An efficient way of bait fishing for tunas recently developed in Senegal. Aquat. Living Resour. 7, 139-151.
7. Fried S.M., Hilborn R., 1988, Inseason forecasting of Bristol Bay, Alaska, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) abundance using Bayesian probability theory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 850-855.
8. Hallier J.P., Delgado de Molina A., 2000, Baitboat as a tuna aggregating device. Le canneur: un dispositif de concentration des thons. In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (Eds.), Pêches thonières et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Edn. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, pp. 553-578.
9. Hallier J.P., Diouf T., Hervé A., Peignon C., 2001, Le Programme MAC : État des opérations et des analyses. Doc. multigraphié, CRODT, IRD, CNROP.
10. Hallier J.-P., Gaertner D., 2002, Comparative efficiency between Betyp tags and Conventional tags. ICCAT Coll. Vol. Sci. Pap. 54, 17-32.
11. Hilborn R., Liermann M., 1998, Standing on the shoulders of giants: learning from experience in fisheries. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 8, 273-283.
12. Hoenig J.M., Warren W.G., Stocker M. 1994, Bayesian and related approaches in fitting surplus production models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 1823-1831.
13. Holbert D., Johnson J.C., 1989, Using prior information in fisheries management: A comparison of classical and Bayesian methods for estimating population parameters. Coast. Manage. 17, 333-347.
14. Kearney R.E. 1982, Methods used by the South Pacific Commission for the survey and assessment of skipjack and baitfish resources. SPC, Tech. Rep. 7, 21-43.
15. Leonard T., Hsu J.S.J., 1999, Bayesian Methods. An analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary researchers. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
16. Maunder M.N., 2001, A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch per unit of effort into stock assessment models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 795-803.
17. Maunder M.N., 2003, Paradigm shifts in fisheries stock assessment: from integrated analysis to Bayesian analysis and back again. Nat. Resour. Model. 16, 465-475.
18. McAllister M.K., Kirkwood G.P., 1998, Bayesian stock assessment: a review and example application using the logistic model. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55, 1031-1060.
19. Meyer R., Millar R.B., 1999, BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1078-1086.
20. Millar R.B., 2002, Reference priors for Bayesian fisheries models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1492-1502.
21. Prince E.D., Ortiz M., Venizelos A., Rosenthal D.S., 2002, In-water conventional tagging techniques developed by the Cooperative Tagging Center for large, highly migratory species. Am. Fish. Symp. 30, 155-171.
22. Punt A.E., Hilborn R., 1997, Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 35-63.
23. Rivot E., Prevost E., 2002, Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of capture-mark-recapture data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1768-1784.
24. Schweder T., 1998, Fisherian or Bayesian methods of integrating diverse statistical information? Fish. Res. 37, 61-75.
25. nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
26. Walters C.J., Ludwig D., 1994, Calculation of Bayes posterior probability distributions for key population parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 713-722.