Surface flow boundary conditions in modeling land subsidence due to fluid withdrawal

Ground Water

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 516-525

  Baú, Domenico ^a   Ferronato, Massimiliano ^b   Gambolati, Giuseppe ^b   Teatini, Pietro ^b  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

LAND SUBSIDENCE; SURFACE FLOW;

GROUNDWATER;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; PERMEABILITY; SUBSIDENCE; SUBSURFACE FLOW;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; GEOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; SOIL; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; GEOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERMEABILITY; SOIL; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 3042767368     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02620.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AGIP. 1996. Alto Adriatico Basin. Rapporte di sintesi. Technical report, AGIP S.p.A., Milano.
2. Baú, D., G. Gambolati, and P. Teatini. 1999a. Residual land subsidence over depleted gas fields in the Northern Adriatic basin. Environmental Engineering Geosciences 5, no. 4: 389-405.
3. Baú, D., G. Gambolati, and P. Teatini. 1999b. Statistical analysis of in situ compaction measurements for anthropogenic land subsidence prediction in the Northern Adriatic basin. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, vol. 1, ed. A.N.S.J. Lippard and R. Sinding-Larsen, 299-304. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir.
4. Biot, M.A. 1941. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics 12, no. 2: 155-164.
5. Chierici, G.L. 1989. Principi di Ingegneria dei Giacimenti Petroliferi. Milano: AGIP S.p.A.
6. Colazas, X.C., and R.W. Strehle. 1995. Subsidence in the Wilmington oil field, Long Beach, California, USA. In Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal: Developments in Petroleum Science 41, ed. G.V. Chilingarian, E.C. Donadson, and T.F. Yen, 285-334. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
7. Finol, A., and Z.A. Sancevic. 1995. Subsidence in Venezuela. In Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal: Developments in Petroleum Science 41, ed. G.V. Chilingarian, E.C. Donadson, and T.F. Yen, 337-372. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
8. Gambolati, G., and P. Teatini. 1998. Numerical analysis of land subsidence due to natural compaction of the Upper Adriatic Sea basin. In CENAS: Coastline Evolution of the Upper Adriatic Sea Due to Sea Level Rise and Natural and Anthropogenic Land Subsidence, ed. G. Gambolati, 103-131. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Gambolati, G., G. Ricceri, W. Bertoni, G. Brighenti, and E. Vuillermin. 1991. Mathematical simulation of the subsidence of Ravenna. Water Resources Research 27, no. 11: 2899-2918.
10. Gambolati, G., M. Putti, and P. Teatini. 1996. Land subsidence. In Hydrology of Disaster, ed. V.P. Singh, 231-268. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Gambolati, G., P. Teatini, D. Baú, and M. Ferronato. 2000. Importance of poro-elastic coupling in dynamically active aquifers of the Po river basin, Italy. Water Resources Research 36, no. 9: 2443-2459.
12. Geertsma, J. 1966. Problems of rock mechanics in petroleum production engineering. In Proceedings of the 1st Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, 585-594.
13. Geertsma, J. 1973. Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Technology 25, 734-744.
14. Gonzalez-Moran, T., R. Rodriguez, and S.A. Cortes. 1999. The basin of Mexico and its metropolitan area: Water abstraction and related environmental problem. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 12, 607-613.
15. Hsieh, P.A. 1996. Deformation-induced changes in hydraulic head during ground water withdrawal. Ground Water 34, no. 6: 1082-1089.
16. Larson, K. J., H. Basagaoglu, and M.A. Marino. 2001. Prediction of optimal safe ground water yield and land subsidence in the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, California, using a calibrated numerical simulation model. Journal of Hydrology 242, 79-102.
17. Lewis, R.W., and B.A. Schrefler. 1998. The Finite Element Method in the Static and Dynamic Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media, 2nd edition. Chichester, United Kingdom: J. Wiley.
18. Lewis, R.W., and Y. Sukirman. 1993. Finite element modelling for simulating the surface subsidence above a compacting hydrocarbon reservoir. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 18, 619-639.
19. Teatini, P., G. Gambolati, and L. Tosi. 1995. A new 3-d non-linear model of the subsidence of Venice. In Proceedings of the V International Symposium on Land Subsidence, The Hague, October, ed. F.B.J. Barends, F.J.J. Brouwer, and F.H. Schroder, 353-361. Wallingford, United Kingdom: International Association of Hydrological Sciences.
20. Teatini, P., D. Baú, and G. Gambolati. 2000. Water-gas dynamics and coastal land subsidence over Chioggia Mare field, Northern Adriatic Sea. Hydrogeology Journal 8, no. 5: 462-479.
21. van der Knaap, W. 1959. Nonlinear behavior of elastic porous media. In Petroleum Transactions of AIME 216, 179-187.
22. Zaman, M.M., A. Abdulraheem, and J.C. Roegiers. 1995. Reservoir compaction and surface subsidence in the North Sea Ekofisk field. In Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal: Developments in Petroleum Science 41, ed. G. Chilingarian, E. Donaldson, and T.F. Yen, chapter 8, pages 373-423. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
23. Zienkiewicz, O.C. 1991. The Finite Element Method in Engineering Geoscience, 4th edition. London: McGraw Hill.