Kinematics of cranial ontogeny: Hheterotopy, heterochrony, and geometric morphometric analysis of growth models

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Volumn 302, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 322-340

  Zollikofer, Christoph Peter Eduard ^a   Ponce De León, Marcia Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HOMINID; HUMAN; MORPHOGENESIS; MORPHOMETRICS; SKULL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TIME;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMETRY; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; HOMINIDAE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MORPHOGENESIS; SKULL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

HOMINIDAE;

EID: 3042762753     PISSN: 0022104X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abzhanov A, Tzahor E, Lassar AB, Tabin V. 2003. Dissimilar regulation of cell differentiation in mesencephalic (cranial) and sacral (trunk) neural crest cells in vitro. Development 130:4567-4579.
2. Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster GF, Wake DB. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296-317.
3. Andresen PR, Nielsen M. 2001. Non-rigid registration by geometry-constrained diffusion. Med Image Anal 5:81-88.
4. Andresen PR, Bookstein FL, Conradsen K, Ersboll BK, Marsh JL, Kreiborg S. 2000. Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:1053-1063.
5. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bookstein FL. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225-243.
7. Cubo J. 2000. Process heterochronies in endochondral ossification. J Theor Biol 205:343-353.
8. Cubo J, Fouces V, González-Martín M, Pedrocchi V, Ruiz X. 2000. Nonheterochronic developmental changes underlie morphological heterochrony in the evolution of the Ardeidae. J Evol Biol 13:269-227.
9. Cubo J, Azagra D, Casinos A, Castanet J. 2002. Heterochronic detection through a function for the ontogenetic variation of bone shape. J Theor Biol 215:57-66.
10. Dean MC, Stringer CB, Bromage TG. 1986. Age at death of the Neanderthal child from Devil's Tower, Gibraltar and the implications for studies of general growth and development in Neanderthals. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:301-309.
11. Dryden IL, Mardia K. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Enlow DH. 1990. Facial growth. Philadelphia: Saunders.
13. Fink WL, Zelditch ML. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: A reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei). Syst Biol 44:344-361.
14. Godfrey LR, Sutherland MR. 1995. Flawed inference: why size-based tests of heterochronic processes do not work. J Theoret Biol 172:43-61.
15. Godfrey LR, Sutherland MR. 1996. Paradox of peramorphic paedomorphosis: heterochrony and human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:17-42.
16. Godfrey LR, King SJ, Sutherland MR. 1998. Heterochronic approaches to the study of locomotion. In: Strasser S, editor. Primate Locomotion. New York: Plenum Press. p 277-307.
17. Good PI. 1994. Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses New York: Springer.
18. Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and pylogeny. Cambridge, MA London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
19. Gould SJ. 2000. Of coiled oysters and big brains: how to rescue the terminology of heterochrony, now gone astray. Evol Dev 2:241-248.
20. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581-598.
21. Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
22. Huxley JS. 1932. Problems of relative growth. London: Methuen.
23. Jeffery N, Spoor F. 2002. Brain size and the human cranial base: a prenatal perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:324-340.
24. Jolicoeur P. 1963. The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics 19:497-499.
25. Jones KL. 1988. Smith's recognizable patterns of human malformation. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
26. Klingenberg CP. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 73:79-123.
27. Krovitz GE. 2000. Three-dimensional comparisons of craniofacial morphology and growth patterns in Neandertals and modern humans. PhD Dissertation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
28. Lele S, Richtsmeier J. 2001. An invariant approach to the statistical analysis of shapes. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
29. Lieberman DE. 1999. Homology and hominid phylogeny: problems and potential solutions. Evol Anthropol 8:142-151.
30. Lieberman DE. 2002. Whither the evolution of human growth and development? Evol Anthropol 11:245-248.
31. Lieberman DE, McCarthy RC. 1999. The ontogeny of cranial base angulation in humans and chimpanzees and its implications for reconstructing pharyngeal dimensions. J Hum Evol 36:487-517.
32. Lieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ. 2000. The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function, and integration. Yb Phys Anthropol 43:117-169.
33. Lieberman DE, McBratney BM, Krovitz G. 2002. The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1134-1139.
34. Manzi G, Vienna A, Hauser G. 1996. Developmental stress and cranial hypostosis by epigenetic trait occurrence and distribution: An exploratory study on the Italian Neandertals. J Hum Evol 30:511-527.
35. McKinney ML. 1999. Heterochrony: beyond words. Paleobiology 23:149-153.
36. McKinney ML, McNamara KJ. 1991. Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny. New York: Plenum Press.
37. McNamara KJ. 1997. Shapes of time: the evolution of growth and development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. McNamara KJ. 2002a. Changing times, changing places: heterochrony and heterotopy. Paleobiology 28:551-558.
39. McNamara KJ. 2002b. Sequential hypermorphosis. Stretching ontogeny to the limit. In: Minugh-Purvis N, McNamara K, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p 102-121.
40. Muybridge E. 1955. The Human figure in motion. New York: Dover.
41. Nehm RH. 2001. The developmental basis of morphological disarmament in Prunum (Neogastropoda: Marginellidae). In: Zelditch ML, editor. Beyond heterochrony: the evolution of development. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc. p 1-26.
42. Neilson KMF, Friesel RE. 1995. Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 by a point mutation associated with Crouzon syndrome. J Biol Chem 270:26037-26040.
43. O'Higgins P. 2000. The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat 197:103-120.
44. Penin X, Berge C, Baylac M. 2002. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:50-62.
45. Ponce de León MS, Zollikofer CPE. 2001. Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature 412:534-538.
46. Raff RA, Wray GA. 1989. Heterochrony: Developmental mechanisms and evolutionary results. J Evol Biol 2:409-434.
47. Rak Y, Kimbel WH, Hovers E. 1994. A Neanderthal infant from Amud Cave, Israel. J Hum Evol 26:313-324.
48. Reardon W, Winter RM, Rutland P, Pulleyn LJ, Jones BM, Malcolm S. 1994. Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet 8:98-103.
49. Rice SH. 1997. The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:907-912.
50. Richtsmeier JT, Cole TM, Krovitz G, Valeri CJ. 1998. Preoperative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 18:64-78.
51. Rogers Ackermann R, Krovitz GE. 2002. Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anat Rec 269:142-147.
52. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40-59.
53. Roopnarine PD. 2001. Testing the hypothesis of heterochrony in morphometric data: lessons from a bivalved mollusc. In: Zelditch ML, editor. Beyond heterochrony: The Evolution of Development. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc. p 271-303.
54. Sailer H, Haers P, Zollikofer C, Warnke T, Carls F, Stucki P. 1998. The value of stereolithographic models for preoperative diagnosis of craniofacial deformities and planning of surgical corrections. Int J Oral Max Surg 27:327-333.
55. Santagati F, Rijli FM. 2003. Cranial neural crest and the building of the vertebrate head. Nat Rev Genet 4:806-820.
56. Sarkar S, Petiot A, Copp A, Ferretti P, Thorogood P. 2001. FGF2 promotes skeletogenic differentiation of cranial neural crest cells. Development 128:2143-2152.
57. Shea BT. 1984. An allometric perspective on the morphological and evolutionary relationships between pygmy (Pan paniscus) and common (Pan troglodytes) chimpanzees. In: Susman R, editor. The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. New York: Plenum Press. p 89-130.
58. Shea BT. 1988. Heterochrony in primates. In: McKinney ML, editor. Heterochrony in Evolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum Press. p 237-266.
59. Slack F, Ruvkun G. 1997. Temporal pattern formation by heterochronic genes. Annu Rev Genet 31:611-634.
60. Tillier A-M. 1986. Quelques aspects de l'ontogénèse du squelette crânien des Néanderthaliens. Anthropos 23:207-216.
61. Vinicius L, Lahr MM. 2003. Morphometric heterochrony and the evolution of growth. Evolution 57:2459-2468.
62. Vrba ES. 1998. Multiphasic growth models and the evolution of prolonged growth exemplified by human brain evolution. J Theor Biol 190:227-239.
63. Wilkie AOM, Slaney SF, Oldridge M, Poole MD, Ashworth GJ, Hockley AD, Hayward RD, David DJ, Pulleyn LJ, Rutland P, Malcolm S, Winter RM, Reardon W. 1995. Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet 9:165-172.
64. Williams FL. 2000. Heterochrony and the human fossil record: comparing Neandertal and modern human craniofacial ontogeny. In: Stringer CB, Barton RNE, Finlayson JC, editors. Neanderthals on the Edge. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 257-267.
65. Williams FL, Godfrey LR, Sutherland MR. 2002. Heterochrony and the evolution of Neandertal and modern human craniofacial form. In: Minugh-Purvis N, McNamara K, editors. Human Evolution through Developmental Change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p 405-441.
66. Wilson GN. 1988. Heterochrony and human malformation. Am J Med Genet 29:311-321.
67. Winter DA. 1990. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: Wiley Interscience.
68. Yu K, Herr AB, Waksman G, Ornitz DM. 2000. Loss of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ligand-binding specificity in Apert syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14536-14541.
69. Zeger SL, Harlow SD. 1987. Mathematical models from laws of growth to tools for biologic analysis: fifty years of Growth. Growth 51:1-21.
70. Zelditch ML, Fink WL. 1996. Heterochrony and heterotopy: Stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology 22:241-254.
71. Zelditch ML, Sheets DH, Fink W. 2003. The ontogenetic dymanics of shape disparity. Paleobiology 29:139-156.
72. Zelditch ML, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2000. Spatiotemporal reorganization of growth rates in the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 54:1363-1371.
73. Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS. 2002. Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape variation in Homo sapiens. Proc Roy Soc B 269:801-807.