Assistive technology use and abandonment among college students with disabilities

International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning

Volumn 3, Issue , 1999, Pages

  Riemer Reiss, Marti L ^a,b,c,d   Wacker, Robbyn R ^b,e,f  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY BILLINGS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^c Montana Assoc Rehab Professionals   (United States)

^d SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Human Development and Family Studies   (United States)

^f IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042755662     PISSN: 12069620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Batavia, A. I., & Hammer, G. S. (1989). Consumer criteria for evaluating assistive devices: Implications for technology transfer. In J. J. Prosperin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12 Annual Conference of Rehabilitation Engineering of North America (pp. 194-195). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
2. Brienza, D., Angelo, J., & Henry, K. (1995). Consumer participation in identifying research and development priorities for power wheelchair input devices and controllers. Assistive Technology, 7(1), 55-62.
3. Brooks, N. A., & Hoyer, E. A. (1989). Consumer evaluation of assistive devices. In J. J. Presperin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (pp. 358-359). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
4. Brown, C. (1993). Assistive computer technology: Opening new doorways. New Directions for Student Services, 64, 89-102.
5. Day, S. L., & Edwards, B. J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 486-492, 503.
6. Giltin, L. N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19(1), 41-46.
7. Huer, M. B. (1990). Special facilities and services for university students with mobility impairment: A demographic study (USA). Assistive Technology, 2(4), 125-130.
8. Johnson, K. L., Dudgeon, B., & Amtmann, D. (1997). Assistive technology in rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 8(2), 389-403.
9. Justesen, T. R., & Menlove, M. (1994). Assistive technology education in rehabilitation counselor programs. Rehabilitation Education, 7, 253-260.
10. LaPlante, M. P., Hendershot, G. E., & Moss, A. J. (1992). Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need and trends (No. 217). Hayattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
11. Mallik, K., & Elder, G. (1993). Consumers who choose use... In M. Binion (Ed.), Proceedings of the RESNA 93 Annual Conference, Engineering the ADA (pp. 39-40). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
12. Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1993). Comparison of assistive device use needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 980-987.
13. National Center for Health Statistics. (1994). Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices. (1999, August 19).
14. Phillips, B. (1993). Technology abandonment from the consumer point of view. National Rehabilitation Information Center Quarterly, 3, 1-10.
15. Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36-45.
16. Raskind, M. (1993). Assistive technology and adults with learning disabilities: A blueprint for exploration and advancement. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(3), 185-196.
17. Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 27-40.
18. Reed, B. J., Fried, J. H., & Rhoades, B. J. (1995). Empowerment and assistive technology: The local resource team model. Journal of Rehabilitation, 61(2), 30-34.
19. Ried, S., Strong, G., Wright, L., Wood, A., Goldman, A., & Bogen, D. (1995). Computers, assistive devices, and augmentative communication aids: Technology for social inclusion. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10(5), 80-90.
20. Rogers, J. C., & Holm, M. B. (1992). Assistive technology device in patients with rheumatic disease: A literature review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(2), 120-127.
21. Scherer, M. J., & Galvin, J. C. (1996). An outcome perspective of quality pathways to most appropriate technology. In J. C. Galvin & M. J. Scherer (Eds.), Evaluating, selecting and using appropriate assistive technology (pp. 1-26). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publication.
22. Scherer, M. J., & Lane, J. P. (1997). Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: An integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(12), 528-535.
23. Yaeda, J., & Rubin, S. E. (1992). Job roles of assistive technology service providers in the United States. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 15, 277-287.