Unsteady supersonic aerodynamics based on BEM, including thickness effects in aeroelastic analysis

Journal of Fluids and Structures

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 801-813

  Soltani, N ^a   Esfahanian, V ^a   Haddadpour, H ^b   Behbahani Nejad, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c SHAHID CHAMRAN UNIVERSITY OF AHVAZ   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL MODELING; SUPERSONIC SPEEDS;

SUPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS;

AERODYNAMICS; AEROELASTICITY; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUTTER; SUPERSONIC FLOW;

EID: 3042744804     PISSN: 08899746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashley H. Zartarian G. Piston theory a new aerodynamic tool for the aeroelastician Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 20 1956 1109-1118
2. Chen, P.C., Liu, D.D., 1983. A harmonic gradient method for unsteady supersonic flow calculations. AIAA Paper 83-0887.
3. Farhat, C., Lesoinne, M., 1996. On the accuracy, stability and performance of the solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems by partitioned procedures. AIAA Paper 96-1388.
4. Harder R.L. Desmarais R.N. Interpolation using surface splines Journal of Aircraft 9 1972 189-191
5. Jones W.P. Appa K.A. Unsteady supersonic aerodynamic theory by the method of potential gradient AIAA Journal 15 1977 59-65
6. Lessing, H.C., Troutman, J.C., Menees, G.P., 1960. Experimental determination of the pressure distribution on a rectangular wing oscillating in the first bending mode for Mach numbers from 0.24 to 1.30. NASA TN-D-344.
7. Liu D.D. James D.K. Chen P.C. Pototzky A.S. Further studies of harmonic gradient method for supersonic aeroelastic applications Journal of Aircraft 28 1991 598-605
8. Liu D.D. Yao Z.X. Sarhaddi D. Chaves F. From piston theory to a unified hypersonic supersonic lifting surface method Journal of Aircraft 34 1997 304-312
9. Morino, L., 1974. A finite element formulation for supersonic flows around complex configurations. TR-74-01, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Boston University.
10. Morino L. Mathematical foundations of integral equation methods Morino L. Computational Methods in Potential Aerodynamics 1985 Computational Mechanics Publications. Springer Berlin
11. Morino L. Chen L.T. Suciu E.O. Steady and oscillatory subsonic and supersonic aerodynamics around complex configurations AIAA Journal 13 1975 368-374
12. Pukkett A.E. Stewart H.J. Aerodynamic performance of delta wings at supersonic speeds Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 14 1947 567-578
13. Rodden, W.P., 1991. Correction factors for supersonic thickness effects. MSC/NASTRAN-WPR-3, The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation.
14. Rodden, W.P., Johnson, E.H., 1994. MSC/NASTRAN Aeroelastic Analysis Users Guide. The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation.
15. Rodden, W.P., Farkas, E.F., Malcom, H.A., Kliszewski, A.M., 1962. Aerodynamic influence coefficients from piston theory: analytical development and computational procedure. Aerospace Corporation TDR-169 (3230-11) TN-2.
16. Soltani, N., Esfahanian, V., Haddadpour, H., 2000. Coupled formulation of structure and aerodynamic with application in panel flutter using eigenanalysis. Proceedings of Eighth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Vol. 2, Montreal, pp. 737-744.
17. Telles J.C.F. Self-adaptive coordinate transformation for efficient numerical evaluation of general boundary element integrals International Journal of Numerical Methods Engineering 24 1987 959-973
18. Tuovila, W.J., McCarty, J.L., 1955. Experimental flutter results for cantilever wing models at Mach numbers up to 3.0. NACA RM L55E11.
19. Van Dyke, M.D., 1953. Supersonic flow past airfoils including nonlinear thickness effect. NACA 1183.