Hybridization and regional sex ratios in Nemophila menziesii

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 786-794

  Barr, C M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytoplasmic male sterility; Genomic conflict; Gynodioecy

Indexed keywords

COLOR; HYBRIDIZATION; SEX RATIO;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; FLOWER; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; HYDROPHYLLACEAE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLOWERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; HYDROPHYLLACEAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PIGMENTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO;

COROLLA; HYDROPHYLLACEAE; NEMOPHILA; NEMOPHILA MENZIESII;

EID: 3042742748     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00732.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allan, A., Mercot, H., Landre, C. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. 1997. The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 5: 1886-1895.
2. Baldwin, B.G., Preston, R.E., Wessa, B.L. & Wetherwaxc, M. 2001. A biosystematic and phylogenetic assessment of sympatric taxa in Blepharizonia (Compositae-Madiinae). Syst. Bot. 26: 184-194.
3. Barton, N.H. & Hewitt, G.M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 113-148.
4. Belhassen, E., Allan, A., Couvet, D., Gouyon, P.-H. & Quetier, F. 1993. Mitochondrial genome of Thymus vulgaris L. (Labiatae) is highly polymorphic between and among natural populations. Heredity 71: 462-472.
5. Charlesworth, D. 1981. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity 46: 27-39.
6. Constance, L. 1941. The genus Nemophila Nutt. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 19: 341-398.
7. Cosmides, M.L. & Tooby, J. 1981. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J. Theor. Biol. 89: 83-129.
8. Couvet, D., Ronce, O. & Gliddon, C. 1998. The maintenance of nucleocytplasmic polymorphism in a metapopulation: the case of gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 152: 59-70.
9. Cruden, R.W. 1972. Pollination biology of Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) with comments on the evolution of oligolectic bees. Evolution 26: 373-389.
10. Cuguen, J., Wattier, R., Samitou-Laprade, P., Forcioli, D., Morchen, M., van Dijk, H. & Vernet, P. 1994. Gynodioecy and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in natural populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Genet. Sel. Evol 26: 87-101.
11. Darwin, C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Engels, B. 1988. Mote Carlo R x C Contingency Table Test. University of Wisconsin, WI.
14. Frank, S.A. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am. Nat. 133: 345-376.
15. Frank, S.A. 1991. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45: 262-267.
16. Frank, S.A. & Barr, C.M. 2002. Spatial dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. In: Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context (J. Silvertown & J. Amonovics, eds), pp. 219-243. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
17. Ganders, F.R. 1978. The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Can. J. Bot. 56: 1400-1408.
18. Gouyon, P.-H., Vichot, F. & van Damme, J.M.M. 1991. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am. Nat. 137: 498-514.
19. Grant, V. & Wilken, D.H. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 149: 213-221.
20. Grun, P. 1976. Cytoplasmic Genetics and Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
21. de Haan, A.A. 1997. New CMS types in Plantago lanceolata and their relatedness. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 539-548.
22. Hardig, T.M., Soltis, P.S. & Soltis, D.E. 2002. Morphological and molecular analysis of putative hybrid speciation in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). Syst. Bot. 27: 734-746.
23. Heywood, J.S. 1986. Clinal variation associated with edaphic ecotones in hybrid populations of Gaillardia pulchella. Evolution 40: 1132-1140.
24. Howell, J.T. 1940. Studies in Ceanothus IV. Leafl. West. Bot. 2: 259-262.
25. Hurst, L.D. & Pomiankowski, A. 1991. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128: 841-858.
26. Hurst, L.D., Atlan, A. & Bengtsson, B.O. 1996. Genetic conflicts. Q. Rev. Biol. 71: 317-364.
27. Kaul, M.L.H. 1988. Male Sterility in Higher Plants. Springer, Berlin.
28. Kesseli, R. & Jain, S.K. 1987. Origin of gynodioecy in Limnanthes: evidence from ecogeographic patterns of variation. Theor. Appl. Gen. 74: 379-386.
29. Klier, K., Leoschke, M.J. & Wendel, J.F. 1991. Hybridization and introgression in White and Yellow Ladyslipper Orchids (Cyrpripedium candidum and C. pubescens). J. Hered. 83: 305-318.
30. Koelewijn, H.P. & van Damme, J.M.M. 1995. Genetics of male sterility in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus: I. Cytoplasmic variation. Genetics 139: 1749-1758.
31. Laser, K.D. & Lersten, N.R. 1972. Anatomy and cytology of microsporogenesis in cytoplasmic male sterile angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 38: 425-454.
32. Lewis, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40: 56-63.
33. McCauley, D.E., Olson, M.S. & Taylor, D.R. 2000. An association between chloroplast DNA haplotype and gender in a plant metapopulation. Evol. Ecol. 14: 181-194.
34. Mogensen, H.L. 1996. The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants. Am. J. Bot. 83: 383-404.
35. Nobs, M.A. 1963. Experimental studies on species relationships in Ceanothus. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. 623: 72.
36. Ostergen, G. 1945. Parasitic nature of extra fragment chromosomes. Bot. Not. 2: 157-163.
37. Raven, P.H. & Axelrod, D.I. 1995. Origin and Relationships of the California Flora. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
38. Rieseberg, L.H. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12. 213-241.
39. Samitou-Laprade, P., Cuguen, J. & Vernet, P. 1994. Cytoplasmic male sterility in plants: molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasmic conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 431-435.
40. SAS Institute 2001. SAS User's Guide Statistics, Version 5. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
41. Schnable, P.S. & Wise, R.P. 1998. The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 175-180.
42. Schoenherr, A.A. 1992. A Natural History of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
43. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New York.
44. Stace, C.A. 1975. Hybridization and the Flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.
45. Yampolsky, C. & Yampolsky, H. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Gen. 3: 1-62.