Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI

Archives of Andrology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 139-143

  Ren, S S ^a   Sun, G H ^a   Ku, C H ^a   Chen, D C ^a   Wu, G J ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Intrauterine insemination; Puresperm; Sperm preparation; Swim up

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL MOTILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MALE; PATH ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TECHNIQUE; TOXICITY; VELOCITY;

ADULT; CELL SEPARATION; CENTRIFUGATION, DENSITY GRADIENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; POVIDONE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SEMEN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY;

EID: 3042741185     PISSN: 01485016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01485010490425566     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS (1988): Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. J Androl 9:367-376.
2. Brita S, Kersti L (2000): The use of Silane-coated silica particles for density gradient centrifugation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 15:857-860.
3. Centola GM, Herko R, et al. (1998): Comparison of sperm separation methods: Effect on recovery, motility, motion parameters, and hyperactivation. Fertil Steril 70:1173-1175.
4. Chen MJ, Bongso A (1999): Comparative evaluation of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception. Hum Reprod 14:759-764.
5. Claassens OE, Menkveld R, Harrison KL (1998): Evaluation of three substitutes for Percoll in sperm isolation by density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod 13:3139-3143.
6. Cummins J, Yovich J (1993): Semen motility enhancement in vitro. Semen Reprod Endocrinol 11:56-71.
7. Elglert Y, Van DBM, Rodesch C (1992): Comparative auto-controlled study between swim-up and Percoll preparation of fresh semen samples for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 7:399-402.
8. Fetterolf PM, Rogers BJ (1990): Prediction of human sperm penetrating ability using computerized motion parameters. Mol Reprod Dev 27:326-331.
9. Hirano Y, et al. (2001): Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro. J Assist Reprod Genet 18:213-218.
10. Jaroudi KA, et al. (1993): Percoll semen preparation enhances human oocyte fertilization in male-factor infertility as shown by a randomized cross-over study. Hum Reprod 9:1438-1442.
11. Kao S, Chao H, Wei H (1995): Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid 4977-bp deletion is associated with diminished fertility and motility of human sperm. Biol Reprod 52:729-736.
12. Liu DY, Clarke GN, Baker HGW (1988): Relationship between motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn Motility Analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro. J Androl 12:231-239.
13. Lopes S, et al. (1998): Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13:896-900.
14. Marc VB, et al. (1998): A first prospective study of the individual straight line velocity of the spermatozoon and its influences on the fertilization rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3103-3107.
15. Mathur S, et al. (1986): A computerized sperm motion analysis. Fertil Steril 46:484-488.
16. Mortimer D (1991): Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 6:173-176.
17. Oehninger S, et al. (1990): Relationship between morphology and motion characteristics of human spermatozoa in semen and in the swim-up sperm fractions. J Androl 11:446-452.
18. Parinaud J, et al. (1996): Are the characteristics of spermatozoa in the insemination medium useful for predicting in-vitro fertilization results? Int J Androl 19:103-108.
19. Stone BA, et al. (1999): Determinants of outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1522-1534.
20. Sun J, Juriscova A, Casper R (1997): Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 56:602-607.
21. Svalander PC, Lundin K, Holmes PV (1995): Endotoxin levels in Percoll density-gradient media used to prepare sperm for human IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 10 (abstract book 2):130.
22. Tariq M, Michael C (2002): The use of intrauterine insemination in Australia and New Zealand. Hum Reprod 17:956-959.
23. Twigg J, Fulton N, Gomez E (1998): Analysis of the impact of intracellular reactive oxygen species generation on the structural and functional integrity of human spermatozoa: Lipid peroxidation, DNA fragmentation and effectiveness of antioxidants. Hum Reprod 13:1429-1436.
24. Younglai EV, et al. (2001): Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 16:1950-1953.