Internet privacy law: A comparison between the United States and the European Union

Computers and Security

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 400-412

  Baumer, David Lee ^a   Earp, Julia Brande ^a   Poindexter, J C ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E commerce; Information privacy; International law; Legislation; Privacy law

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INFORMATION PRIVACY; INTERNATIONAL LAWS; PRIVACY LAWS; WEB BASED SYSTEMS;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 3042736362     PISSN: 01674048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2003.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adkinson W.F., Eisenach J.A., Lenard T.M. Privacy online: a report on the information practices and policies of commercial web sites. 2002;Progress & Freedom Foundation, Washington, DC, http://www.pff.org/publications/ privacyonlinefinalael.pdf. Last accessed July 18, 2003.
2. Baumer D.B., Earp J.B., Payton F.C. Privacy of medical records: IT implications of HIPAA. ACM Comput Soc. 30:(4):December 2000;40-47.
3. Baumer D.L., Earp J.B., Evers P.S. Tit for tat in cyberspace: consumer and web site responses to anarchy in the market for personal information. J Law Technol. 4:(2):2003;217-274.
4. CDT's guide to online privacy: privacy basics: the OECD Guidelines. http://www.cdt.org/privacy/guide/basic/oecdguidelines.html:2000;. Accessed on August 6, 2002.
5. Earp J.B., Baumer D.L. Innovative web use to learn about consumer behavior and online privacy. Commun ACM. 46:(4):2003;81-83.
6. Earp JB, Anton AI, Aiman-Smith L, Stufflebeam W. Crossed signals: what users really want from Internet privacy policies. The Academy of Management; August 1-6, 2003.
7. Federal Trade Commission. Privacy online: Fair Information Practices in the electronic marketplace. A Report to Congress; 2000.
8. Hinde S. Privacy legislation: a comparison of the US and European approaches. Comput Secur. July:2003;378-387.
9. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations. 1991;McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, England.
10. Ives B., Jarvenpaa S.L. Applications of global information technology: key issues for management. MIS Q. March:1991;33-48.
11. Loring T. An analysis of the informational privacy protection afforded by the European Union and the United States. Tex Int Law J. 37:(2):Spring 2002;421-460.
12. Milberg S.J., Burke S.J., Smith H.J., Kallman E.A. Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches. Commun ACM. 38:(12):1995;65-74.
13. Milberg S.J., Smith H.J., Burke S.J. Information privacy: corporate management and national regulation. Organ Sci. 11:(1):January-February 2000;35-57.
14. The Code of Fair Information Practices. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems, Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens, viii; 1973. Available from: http://www.epic.org/privacy/consumer/code_fair_info.html. Last accessed September 28, 2003.
15. Online Privacy Protection Testimony of FTC Commissioner Sheila F. Anthony Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; May 25, 2000. Available from: http://www.senate.gov/~commerce/hearings/0525ant.pdf. Last accessed September 28, 2003.
16. Volokh E. Personalization and privacy. Commun ACM. 43:(8):2000;84-88.
17. Westin A. Privacy and freedom. 1967;Atheneum, New York.