The strong ring: A basic interest model of occupational structure

Journal of Counseling Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 299-313

  Armstrong, Patrick Ian ^a   Donnay, David A C ^b   Smith, Thomas J ^c   Rounds, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Consulting Psychologists Press ^*  (United States)

^c NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MALE; MANAGER; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RATING SCALE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKILL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 3042735795     PISSN: 00220167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.299     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Arabie, P., Carroll, J. D., & DeSarbo, W. (1987). Three-way scaling and clustering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Borgen, F. H. (1986). New approaches to the assessment of interests. In B. W. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Advances in vocational psychology, Vol. I: The assessment of interests (pp. 83-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Burton-Jones, A. (2001). Knowledge capitalism: Business, work, and learning in the new economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Campbell, D. P. (1971). Handbook for the Strong Vocational Interest Blank. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Campbell, D. P. (1974). Manual for the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Campbell, D. P., & Borgen, F. H. (1999). Holland's theory and the development of interest inventories. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 86-101.
8. Campbell, D. P., Borgen, F. H., Eastes, S. H., Johansson, C. B., & Peterson, R. A. (1968). A set of basic interest scales for the Strong Vocational Interest Blank for men [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6, Part 2), 1-54.
9. Costanza, D. P., Fleishman, E. A., & Marshall-Mies, J. (1999). Knowledges. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of the O*NET (pp. 71-90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456-473.
11. Dawis, R. V. (1992). The structure(s) of occupations: Beyond RIASEC. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 171-178.
12. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Day, S. X, & Rounds, J. (1997). A little more than kin and less than kind: Basic interests in vocational research and career counseling. Career Development Quarterly, 45, 207-220.
14. Donnay, D. A. C., & Borgen, F. H. (1996). Validity, structure, and content of the 1994 Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 275-291.
15. Droege, R. C., & Hawk, J. (1977). Development of a U. S. Employment Service interest inventory. Journal of Employment Counseling, 14, 65-71.
16. Gati, I. (1991). The structure of vocational interests. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 309-324.
17. Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18. Gottfredson, L. S., & Richards, J. M., Jr. (1999). The meaning and measurement of environments in Holland's theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 57-73.
19. Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Bond, N. A., & Sutton, M. A. (1954). A factor analytic study of human interests. Psychological Monographs, 68(4, Whole No. 375).
20. Hansen, J. C. (1984). The measurement of vocational interests: Issues and future directions. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 99-136). New York: Wiley.
21. Hansen, J. C., Kozberg, J. G., & Goranson, D. (1994). Accuracy of student recall of Strong Interest Inventory results 1 year after interpretation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 235-242.
22. Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Strong Interest Inventory applications and technical guide. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23. Hesketh, B., & Bochner, S. (1994). Technological change in a multicultural context: Implications for training and career planning. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 4 (2nd ed., pp. 191-240). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35-45.
25. Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist, 51, 397-406.
26. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
27. Holland, J. L., Whitney, D. R., Cole, N. S., & Richards, J. M., Jr. (1969). An empirical occupational classification derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research (ACT Research Report No. 29). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
28. Hubbard, M., McCloy, R., Campbell, J., Nottingham, J., Lewis, P., Rivkin, D., & Levin, J. (2000). Revision of O*NET data collection instruments. Raleigh, NC: National O*NET Consortium, Employment Security Commission.
29. Jackson, D. N. (1977). Manual for the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
30. Jeanneret, P. R., Borman, W. C., Kubisiak, U. C., & Hanson, M. A. (1999). Generalized work activities. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of the O*NET (pp. 105-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Kuder, F. G. (1977). Activity interests and occupational choice. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
33. Levine, C., & Salmon, L. (1999). The 1998 SOC: Bridge to occupational classification in the 21st century. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 43, 27-33.
34. McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1999). Holland's theory and occupational information. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 74-85.
35. Muchinsky, P. M. (1999). Applications of Holland's theory in industrial and organizational settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 127-135.
36. Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.
37. Ralston, C. A., Borgen, F. H., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Donnay, D. A. C. (in press). Specificity in interest measurement: Basic Interest Scales and major field of study. Journal of Vocational Behavior.
38. Rayman, J., & Atanasoff, L. (1999). Holland's theory and career intervention: The power of the Hexagon. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 114-126.
39. Rounds, J. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. In D. Lubinski & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods and findings (pp. 177-232). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
40. Rounds, J. B., Jr., & Dawis, R. V. (1979). Factor analysis of Strong Vocational Interest Blank Items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 132-143.
41. Rounds, J., & Day, S. X (1999). Describing, evaluating, and creating vocational interest structures. In M. L. Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.), Vocational interests: Meaning measurement, and counseling use (pp. 103-133). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
42. Savickas, M. L. (1995). Current theoretical issues in vocational psychology: Convergence, divergence, and schism. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 1-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Strong, E. K., Jr. (1927) Vocational Interest Blank. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Strong, M. H., Jeanneret, P. R., McPhail, S. M., Barkley, B. R., & D'Egidio, E. L. (1999). Work context: Taxonomy and measurement of the work environment. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of the O*NET (pp. 127-145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Swaney, K. B. (1995). Technical manual: Revised unisex edition of the ACT Interest Inventory (UNIACT). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
46. Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Personal Globe Inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and competence beliefs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 113-172.
47. Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational-interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
48. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1995). The arbitrary nature of Holland's RIASEC types: A concentric-circles structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 431-439.
49. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). The spherical representation of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 3-41.
50. U. S. Department of Labor. (1979). Guide for occupational exploration. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
51. U. S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
52. U. S. Department of Labor. (2003). O*NET 4.0 database. Retrieved June 4, 2003, from http://www.onetcenter.org/database.html