Packet narrowing and quantum entanglement in photoionization and photodissociation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 5 A, 2004, Pages

  Fedorov, M V ^a   Efremov, M A ^a   Kazakov, A E ^a   Chan, K W ^b   Law, C K ^c   Eberly, J H ^b  

^a PROKHOROV GENERAL PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CHARGED PARTICLES; CORRELATION METHODS; DETECTORS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHOTODISSOCIATION; PHOTOIONIZATION;

DIATOMIC MOLECULES; PACKET-NARROWING EFFECTS; QUANTUM STATES; VALENCE ELECTRONS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 3042733001     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052117     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. K. Gottfried, Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1966), pp. 463-474.
2. M. V. Fedorov, Atomic and Free Electrons in a Strong Light Field (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
3. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
4. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
5. A. Ekert and P. L. Knight, Am. J. Phys. 63, 415 (1995).
6. The Schmidt theorem is equivalent to the singular value decomposition in matrix theory. Mathematical details can be found, for example, in A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995).
7. J. H. Eberly, K. W. Chan, and C. K. Law, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 361, 1519 (2003).
8. K. W. Chan, C. K. Law, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 100402 (2002); Phys. Rev. A 68, 022110 (2003).
9. K. W. Chan, C. K. Law, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 100402 (2002); Phys. Rev. A 68, 022110 (2003).
10. K. W. Chan, C. K. Law, M. V. Fedorov, and J. H. Eberly, J. Mod. Phys. (to be published).
11. H. Huang and J. H. Eberly, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 915 (1993); C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000).
12. H. Huang and J. H. Eberly, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 915 (1993); C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5304 (2000).
13. C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, e-print quant-ph/0312088; Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).
14. C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, e-print quant-ph/0312088; Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).
15. M. D. Reid and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2731 (1988); M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
16. M. D. Reid and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2731 (1988); M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
17. T. Opatrny and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3180 (2001).
18. L D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Perga-mon Press, Oxford, 1977).
19. A. V. Rau, J. A. Dunningham, and K. Burnett, Science 301, 1081 (2003).
20. Rules for breakup processes, explicitly joining localization measurements to a Schmidt analysis, will be treated elsewhere.