A case of hysterotomy for removal of an intrauterine contraceptive device and subsequent pregnancy

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 177-178

  New, Fiona C ^a   Candelier, Claire K ^a  

^a STEPPING HILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CESAREAN SECTION; CHINA; CHINESE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPY; HYSTEROTOMY; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CHINA; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 3042732898     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/1471189041261654     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Jin EQ. Study of IUD side effects indicated in hysteroscopic and pathologic examinations. Shengzhi Yu Biyun 1991; 11: 69-71.
2. Perkin GW, Perkin GW, Genstein J, et al. Contraceptive use in China. PIACT Prod News 1980; 2: 1-8.
3. China changes from the stainless steel ring to modern IUDs. Prog Hum Reprod Res 1993; 27: 7.
4. Stillwell S. How to remove a Chinese IUD (Letter). J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003: 29(2): 60.
5. Farley TM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, et al. IUDs and PID; an international perspective. Lancet 1992; 339: 785-788.