Inoculating against prejudice: A discursive approach to homophobia and sexism in adolescent male talk

Psychology of Men and Masculinity

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 178-189

  Korobov, Neill ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042730071     PISSN: 15249220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1524-9220.5.2.178     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and life History, 7, 335-342.
2. Bamberg, M. (2000). Language and communication: What develops? Determining the role of language practices for a theory of development. In N. Budwig, I. Uzgiris, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 55-77). Stamford, CT: Ablex/JAJ.
3. Bamberg, M. (in press). "I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn't really care less about her anyway." Form and functions of "slut-bashing" in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development.
4. Begany, J. J., & Milbum, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3, 119-126.
5. Benwell, B. (2002). Is there anything "new" about these lads? The textual and visual construction of masculinity in men's magazines. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 149-173). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
6. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10, 543-558.
7. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
8. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Eckert, P. (1998). Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 64-75). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11. Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1997). Jockeying for position: The construction of masculine identities. Discourse and Society, 8, 203-217.
12. Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing non-literal. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 347-373.
13. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
14. Gough, B. (2001). "Biting your tongue:" Negotiating masculinities in contemporary Britain. Journal of Gender Studies, 10, 169-185.
15. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. London: Polity Press.
16. Johnson, S., & Meinhof, U. H. (Eds.). (1997). Language and masculinity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
17. Kilianski, S. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men's attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 37-56.
18. Rimmel, M. S. (1987). The contemporary crisis of masculinity in historical perspective. In H. Brod (Ed.), Making of masculinities: The men's studies (pp. 121-153). Boston: Allen & Unwin.
19. Korobov, N. (2001). Reconciling theory with method: From conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis to positioning analysis [36 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research], 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng. htm
20. Korobov, N. (2002). "Narratives" as drawn-upon and "narratives" as occasioned: Challenges in reconciling an "emic" and "etic" analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 12, 413-422.
21. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
22. Mills, S. (2003). Caught between sexism, anti-sexism and "political correctness:" Feminist women's negotiations with naming practices. Discourse and Society, 14, 87-110.
23. Morgan, D. H. J. (1990). Men, masculinity and sociological inquiry. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 83-113). London: Routledge.
24. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Fleck, J. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm. An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.
27. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction, London: Sage.
29. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
30. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage.
31. Speer, S., & Potter, J. (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse and Society, 11, 543-572.
32. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
33. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34. Walker, D. F., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 98-108.
35. Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices, Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335-356.
36. Widdicombe, S., & Wooffitt, R. (1995). The language of youth subcultures. Social identity In action. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.