Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: Lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 327-337

  Thorsell, Sara ^a   Epplin, Francis M ^a   Huhnke, Raymond L ^a   Taliaferro, Charles M ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biorefinery; Cost; Economics; Gasification fermentation; Harvest; Lignocellulosic biomass

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY; AGRICULTURAL WASTES; BIOMASS; COSTS; CROPS; FEEDSTOCKS; FERMENTATION;

BIOREFINERIES; STORAGE LOSSES;

HARVESTING;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOMASS POWER; ENERGY CROP; HARVESTING;

POACEAE;

EID: 3042728218     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. US Environmental Protection Agency. The clean air act amendments of 1990. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation. Washington, DC, USA. 1990.
2. National Research Council. Review of the research strategy for biomass-derived transportation fuels. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, USA. 1999.
3. Lynd L.R., Cushman J.H., Nichols R.J., Wyman C.E. Ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science. 251(4999):1991;1318-1323
4. Vollebergh H. Environmental externalities and social optimality in biomass markets. waste-to-energy in the Netherlands and biofuels in France Fuel and Energy Abstracts. 38:1997;411
5. Wyman C.E. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. technology, economics and opportunities Bioresource Technology. 50(1):1994;3-16
6. Rajagopalan S., Datar R.P., Lewis R.S. Formation of ethanol from carbon monoxide via a new microbial catalyst. Biomass and Bioenergy. 23(6):2002;487-493
7. Hall D.O., Scrase J.L. Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future? Biomass and Bioenergy. 15(4-5):1998;357-367
8. Hohmann N, Rendleman CM. Emerging technologies in ethanol production. Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 663, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC, USA. 1993.
9. Keeney D.R., DeLuca T.H. Biomass as an energy source for the Midwestern US. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 7:1992;137-144
10. Mauguiri P. Do we need biofuels? Fuel and Energy Abstracts. 38:1997;326
11. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. Powerful partnerships: the federal role in international cooperation on energy innovation. Executive Office of the President. Washington, DC, USA; 1999.
12. Cundiff J.S., Harris W.L. Maximizing output-maximizing profits. production of herbaceous biomass for fiber conversion should be a carefully managed equipment-based enterprise Resource. 2:1995;8-9
13. English B.C., Short C., Heady E.O. The economic feasibility of crop residues as auxiliary fuel in coal-fired power plants. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 63(4):1981;636-644
14. Epplin F.M. Cost to produce and deliver switchgrass biomass to an ethanol-conversion facility in the southern plains of the United States. Biomass and Bioenergy. 11(6):1996;459-467
15. Gallagher P., Johnson D. Some new ethanol technology. cost competition and adoption effects in the petroleum market The Energy Journal. 20(2):1999;89-120
16. Glassner DA, Hettenhaus JR, Schechinger TM. Corn stover collection project. Paper presented at the Great Lakes Regional Biomass conference, BioEnergy '98. Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 1998.
17. Kaylen M., Van Dyne D.L., Choi Y.S., Blasé M. Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Bioresource Technology. 72(1):2000;19-32
18. Mann MD, Bryan M. Feasibility of producing ethanol from biomass in Northeastern North Dakota and Northwestern Minnesota. Energy & Environmental Research Center. University of North Dakota, Publication 2000-EERC-10-01. Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 2001.
19. Nienow S., McNamara K.T., Gillespie A.R. Assessing plantation biomass for co-firing with coal in Northern Indiana. a linear programming approach Biomass and Bioenergy. 18(2):2000;125-135
20. Walsh M.E. US bioenergy crop economic analyses. status and needs Biomass and Bioenergy. 14(4):1998;341-350
21. Kadam K.L., Forrest L.H., Jacobson W.A. Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource. collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects Biomass and Bioenergy. 18(5):2000;369-389
22. Nilsson D. SHAM - a simulation model for designing straw fuel delivery systems. Part 1. model description Biomass and Bioenergy. 16(1):1999;25-38
23. Nilsson D. SHAM - a simulation model for designing straw fuel delivery systems. Part 2. model applications Biomass and Bioenergy. 16(1):1999;39-50
24. Kastens T, Dhuyvetter K. 2001 harvest year report for USCHI's custom harvester analysis and management program (CHAMP). Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University. Manhattan, Kansas, USA. 2002.
25. Hadders G., Olsson R. Harvest of grass for combustion in late summer and in spring. Biomass and Bioenergy. 12(3):1997;171-175
26. Huhnke R. Agricultural field machinery cost estimation software. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University. Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA; 1999.
27. Kletke D, Sestak R. The operation and use of MACHSEL: a farm machinery selection template. Computer Software Series CSS-53. Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University. Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA; 1991.
28. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. ASAE standards: standards, engineering practices and data adopted by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA, 1999, p. 353-66.
29. American Agricultural Economics Association. Commodity costs and returns estimation handbook. American Agricultural Economics Association. Ames, Iowa, USA; 2000.
30. Schechinger T. Current corn stover collection methods and the future. BioMass Agri Products. Harlan, Iowa, USA; 2000.
31. Sokhansanj S, Wright L. Impact of future biorefineries on feedstock supply systems. ASAE Meeting Presentation, Paper Number 021073. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA; 2002.