The implications of managed care and welfare reform for the integration of health and welfare services

Journal of Health and Social Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 1-19

  Austin, Michael J ^a   Prince, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Managed care; Service integration; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; SOCIAL POLICY; WELFARE REFORM;

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MANAGED CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; WELFARE;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3042728094     PISSN: 08977186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J045v18n02_01     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Austin, M., Dubrow, A., Kelley, J., Martin, M., & Walter, C. (1998). Mapping the links between health and welfare. The University of California School of Social Welfare: The Bay Area Social Services Consortium.
2. California Poverty Research Center (1999). Expansion of health care to the working poor. CPRC Brief, 11(5).
3. Chapin, G. & Nelson, K. (1993). Member services, member education and marketing in a managed care program serving a culturally and linguistically diverse, low income population. Washington, DC: Group Health Association of America.
4. Corsello, D., Brandt, K., & Murtaza, N. (1999). Integrating two different organizational cultures: The Napa Human Services Experience. In M. J. Austin (Ed.), Guiding organizational change: A casebook for executive development in the human services. University of California School of Social Welfare: Bay Area Social Services Consortium, pp. 55-60.
5. Dandoy, S. (1994). Filling the gaps: The role of public health departments under welfare reform. Journal of Public Health Policy, May/June, 6-13.
6. Danziger, S., Corcoran, M., Heflin, C., Kalil, J., Levine, J., Rosen, D., Seefeldt, K., Siefert, K., & Tolman, R. (1999). Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. University of Michigan Poverty Research & Training Center, 1-45 〈http://www.ssw. umich.edu/poverty/pubs.html〉.
7. Department of Health. "Partnership in Action: New Opportunities for Joint Working Between Health and Social Services (A Discussion Document)," London, England: Crown Publication, September 1998.
8. Friedman, E. (1997). California public hospitals: The buck has stopped. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(7), 577-581.
9. Glisson, C. & James, L. (1992). The interorganizational coordination of services to children in state custody. Administration in Social Work, 16(3-4), 65-80.
10. Goldman, N. (1995). Proposal for a financing structure to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of human service delivery to children and families in Contra Costa County. Martinez, CA: Contra Costa County Health Department.
11. Henley, A. & Clifford, M. (1993). Managed health care for Medicaid enrollees: The Philadelphia model. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 4(3), 210-217.
12. Holian, J., Wiener, J., & Wallin, S. (1999). Health policy for the low-income population: Major findings from the Assessing the New Federalism case studies. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
13. Ingram, J., Rawls, R., & Moberly, H. (1993). Using incentives to motivate women to seek prenatal care: An effective outreach strategy. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 5(1), 23-32.
14. The Institute for Health Policy Solutions (2001). Barriers to re-enrollment in Medi-Cal and strategies for retaining eligible children: Parents and county workers speak out in Santa Clara County. Fremont, CA: The Child and Family Coverage Technical Assistance Center, Issue Brief #21-01.
15. Kramer, F.D. (1998). The hard-to-place: Understanding the population and strategies to serve them. The Welfare Information Network, 2(5), 1-16 〈http://www.welfareinfo. org/hardo.htm〉.
16. Mason, M. & Kahn, H. (1991). 1990 Member survey report. San Mateo, CA: Health Plan of San Mateo.
17. Medical Community Assistance Project (1997). Rush to managed care: The California two-plan model for Medi-cal. San Francisco: Medi-Cal Community Assistance Project.
18. Olson, K. & Pavetti, L. (1996). Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. The Urban Institute, 1-37 〈http://www.urban.org/welfare/report1.htm〉.
19. Pavetti, L.A. (1996). Time on welfare and welfare dependency. The Urban Institute, 1-5 〈http://www.urban.org/welfare/pavtes.htm〉.
20. Pavetti, L., Olson, K., Nightingale, D., Duke, A., & Isaacs, J. (1997). Welfare-to-work options for families facing personal and family challenges: Rationale and program strategies. The Urban Institute, 1-42 〈http://www.urban.org/welfare/pave1197.html〉.
21. Stollman, J. (1994). New York will enroll 30-million Medicaid patients in managed care. Health Systems Review, 27(1), 5-7.
22. Sumner, L., Parrott, S., & Mann, C. (1996). Millions of uninsured and underinsured children are eligible for Medicaid. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
23. The Urban Institute (1999). Profile of disability among AFDC families. 1-4 〈http://www.urban.org/periodcl/26_2/prr26_2d.htm〉.